diff options
| author | Gabriel F. T. Gomes <gabrielftg@linux.ibm.com> | 2019-07-11 11:47:06 -0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Gabriel F. T. Gomes <gabrielftg@linux.ibm.com> | 2019-11-22 18:12:37 -0300 |
| commit | 5bbbd5ae057c8f862e65d9a230bccb2364f48f96 (patch) | |
| tree | d11c663185dc3c8eac33ca7ac74eaf6a8aa66f9c /sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-128ibm-compat/test-wprintf-ldbl-compat.c | |
| parent | 329037cead5f7930c6081d130b22e03b0ff5e3a8 (diff) | |
| download | glibc-5bbbd5ae057c8f862e65d9a230bccb2364f48f96.tar.gz glibc-5bbbd5ae057c8f862e65d9a230bccb2364f48f96.tar.xz glibc-5bbbd5ae057c8f862e65d9a230bccb2364f48f96.zip | |
ldbl-128ibm-compat: Test double values
A single format string can take double and long double parameters at the same time. Internally, these parameters are routed to the same function, which correctly reads them and calls the underlying functions responsible for the actual conversion to string. This patch adds a new case to test this scenario. Tested for powerpc64le. Reviewed-By: Paul E. Murphy <murphyp@linux.ibm.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-128ibm-compat/test-wprintf-ldbl-compat.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-128ibm-compat/test-wprintf-ldbl-compat.c | 42 |
1 files changed, 22 insertions, 20 deletions
diff --git a/sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-128ibm-compat/test-wprintf-ldbl-compat.c b/sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-128ibm-compat/test-wprintf-ldbl-compat.c index 71edfec235..def4337571 100644 --- a/sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-128ibm-compat/test-wprintf-ldbl-compat.c +++ b/sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-128ibm-compat/test-wprintf-ldbl-compat.c @@ -51,21 +51,22 @@ do_test_call_varg (FILE *stream, const wchar_t *format, ...) } static void -do_test_call_rarg (FILE *stream, const wchar_t *format, long double ld) +do_test_call_rarg (FILE *stream, const wchar_t *format, long double ld, + double d) { wchar_t string[128]; wprintf (L"%15Ls", L"fwprintf: "); - fwprintf (stream, format, ld); + fwprintf (stream, format, ld, d); wprintf (L"\n"); wprintf (L"%15Ls", L"swprintf: "); - swprintf (string, 127, format, ld); + swprintf (string, 127, format, ld, d); wprintf (L"%Ls", string); wprintf (L"\n"); wprintf (L"%15Ls", L"wprintf: "); - wprintf (format, ld); + wprintf (format, ld, d); wprintf (L"\n"); } @@ -73,14 +74,15 @@ static void do_test_call (void) { long double ld = -1; + double d = -1; /* Print in decimal notation. */ - do_test_call_rarg (stdout, L"%.10Lf", ld); - do_test_call_varg (stdout, L"%.10Lf", ld); + do_test_call_rarg (stdout, L"%.10Lf, %.10f", ld, d); + do_test_call_varg (stdout, L"%.10Lf, %.10f", ld, d); /* Print in hexadecimal notation. */ - do_test_call_rarg (stdout, L"%.10La", ld); - do_test_call_varg (stdout, L"%.10La", ld); + do_test_call_rarg (stdout, L"%.10La, %.10a", ld, d); + do_test_call_varg (stdout, L"%.10La, %.10a", ld, d); } static int @@ -91,18 +93,18 @@ do_test (void) /* Compare against the expected output. */ const char *expected = - " fwprintf: -1.0000000000\n" - " swprintf: -1.0000000000\n" - " wprintf: -1.0000000000\n" - " vfwprintf: -1.0000000000\n" - " vswprintf: -1.0000000000\n" - " vwprintf: -1.0000000000\n" - " fwprintf: -0x1.0000000000p+0\n" - " swprintf: -0x1.0000000000p+0\n" - " wprintf: -0x1.0000000000p+0\n" - " vfwprintf: -0x1.0000000000p+0\n" - " vswprintf: -0x1.0000000000p+0\n" - " vwprintf: -0x1.0000000000p+0\n"; + " fwprintf: -1.0000000000, -1.0000000000\n" + " swprintf: -1.0000000000, -1.0000000000\n" + " wprintf: -1.0000000000, -1.0000000000\n" + " vfwprintf: -1.0000000000, -1.0000000000\n" + " vswprintf: -1.0000000000, -1.0000000000\n" + " vwprintf: -1.0000000000, -1.0000000000\n" + " fwprintf: -0x1.0000000000p+0, -0x1.0000000000p+0\n" + " swprintf: -0x1.0000000000p+0, -0x1.0000000000p+0\n" + " wprintf: -0x1.0000000000p+0, -0x1.0000000000p+0\n" + " vfwprintf: -0x1.0000000000p+0, -0x1.0000000000p+0\n" + " vswprintf: -0x1.0000000000p+0, -0x1.0000000000p+0\n" + " vwprintf: -0x1.0000000000p+0, -0x1.0000000000p+0\n"; TEST_COMPARE_STRING (expected, result.out.buffer); return 0; |