ldbl-128ibm-compat: Add wide character, fortified printing functions

Similarly to what was done for the regular character, fortified printing
functions, this patch combines the mode masks PRINTF_LDBL_USES_FLOAT128
and PRINTF_FORTIFY to provide wide character versions of fortified
printf functions.  It also adds two flavors of test cases: one that
explicitly calls the fortified functions, and another that reuses the
non-fortified test, but defining _FORTIFY_SOURCE as 2.  The first
guarantees that the implementations are actually being tested
(independently of what's in bits/wchar2.h), whereas the second
guarantees that the redirections calls the correct function in the IBM
and IEEE long double cases.

Tested for powerpc64le.

Reviewed-By: Paul E. Murphy <murphyp@linux.ibm.com>

1 files changed, 113 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-128ibm-compat/test-wprintf-chk-ldbl-compat.c b/sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-128ibm-compat/test-wprintf-chk-ldbl-compat.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..f614004f27
--- /dev/null
+++ b/sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-128ibm-compat/test-wprintf-chk-ldbl-compat.c
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+/* Test for the long double variants of *w*printf_chk functions.
+   Copyright (C) 2019 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+   This file is part of the GNU C Library.
+
+   The GNU C Library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+   modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
+   License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
+   version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
+
+   The GNU C Library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+   but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+   MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
+   Lesser General Public License for more details.
+
+   You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
+   License along with the GNU C Library; if not, see
+   <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.  */
+
+#define _FORTIFY_SOURCE 2
+
+#include <stdarg.h>
+#include <stdint.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <wchar.h>
+
+#include <support/capture_subprocess.h>
+#include <support/check.h>
+
+static void
+do_test_call_varg (FILE *stream, const wchar_t *format, ...)
+{
+  wchar_t string[128];
+  va_list args;
+
+  wprintf (L"%20Ls", L"__vfwprintf_chk: ");
+  va_start (args, format);
+  __vfwprintf_chk (stream, 1, format, args);
+  va_end (args);
+  wprintf (L"\n");
+
+  wprintf (L"%20Ls", L"__vswprintf_chk: ");
+  va_start (args, format);
+  __vswprintf_chk (string, 79, 1, 127, format, args);
+  va_end (args);
+  wprintf (L"%Ls", string);
+  wprintf (L"\n");
+
+  wprintf (L"%20Ls", L"__vwprintf_chk: ");
+  va_start (args, format);
+  __vwprintf_chk (1, format, args);
+  va_end (args);
+  wprintf (L"\n");
+}
+
+static void
+do_test_call_rarg (FILE *stream, const wchar_t *format, long double ld)
+{
+  wchar_t string[128];
+
+  wprintf (L"%20Ls", L"__fwprintf_chk: ");
+  __fwprintf_chk (stream, 1, format, ld);
+  wprintf (L"\n");
+
+  wprintf (L"%20Ls", L"__swprintf_chk: ");
+  __swprintf_chk (string, 79, 1, 127, format, ld);
+  wprintf (L"%Ls", string);
+  wprintf (L"\n");
+
+  wprintf (L"%20Ls", L"__wprintf_chk: ");
+  __wprintf_chk (1, format, ld);
+  wprintf (L"\n");
+}
+
+static void
+do_test_call (void)
+{
+  long double ld = -1;
+
+  /* Print in decimal notation.  */
+  do_test_call_rarg (stdout, L"%.10Lf", ld);
+  do_test_call_varg (stdout, L"%.10Lf", ld);
+
+  /* Print in hexadecimal notation.  */
+  do_test_call_rarg (stdout, L"%.10La", ld);
+  do_test_call_varg (stdout, L"%.10La", ld);
+}
+
+static int
+do_test (void)
+{
+  struct support_capture_subprocess result;
+  result = support_capture_subprocess ((void *) &do_test_call, NULL);
+
+  /* Compare against the expected output.  */
+  const char *expected =
+    "    __fwprintf_chk: -1.0000000000\n"
+    "    __swprintf_chk: -1.0000000000\n"
+    "     __wprintf_chk: -1.0000000000\n"
+    "   __vfwprintf_chk: -1.0000000000\n"
+    "   __vswprintf_chk: -1.0000000000\n"
+    "    __vwprintf_chk: -1.0000000000\n"
+    "    __fwprintf_chk: -0x1.0000000000p+0\n"
+    "    __swprintf_chk: -0x1.0000000000p+0\n"
+    "     __wprintf_chk: -0x1.0000000000p+0\n"
+    "   __vfwprintf_chk: -0x1.0000000000p+0\n"
+    "   __vswprintf_chk: -0x1.0000000000p+0\n"
+    "    __vwprintf_chk: -0x1.0000000000p+0\n";
+  TEST_COMPARE_STRING (expected, result.out.buffer);
+
+  return 0;
+}
+
+#include <support/test-driver.c>