From d73cccc5a7250fedc436333a7e86f7ac2b2e1fe7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Leah Neukirchen Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 22:29:06 +0100 Subject: README: recommend borg over attic --- README | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/README b/README index c55e5a5..ae73f41 100644 --- a/README +++ b/README @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ on two days: Obviously, there are many similar scripts, among which I have used dirvish and rsnapshot before writing rdumpfs for keeping daily dumps. -Currently I use rdumpfs and attic. +Currently I use rdumpfs and borg. * dirvish: Requires Perl with non-standard libraries. Cannot continue partial backups. Complex configuration. No push backup. @@ -78,13 +78,16 @@ Currently I use rdumpfs and attic. * rsback: Requires Perl. No date-based directory naming. * attic: Requires Python. Backups are not kept accessible in the + file system. Unmaintained. + +* borg: Requires Python. Backups are not kept accessible in the file system. Else highly recommended. == When not use rdumpfs? -* You want encrypted backups (try attic, duplicity). +* You want encrypted backups (try borg, duplicity). * You need incremental backups on a higher granularity than files (try - attic, bup, vac, dar). + borg, bup, vac, dar). * Your target doesn't support hardlinks/SSH/rsync (try duplicity). * You want automatic expiry (try dirvish). -- cgit 1.4.1