diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/patent_summary')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/patent_summary | 100 |
1 files changed, 100 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/patent_summary b/doc/patent_summary new file mode 100644 index 00000000..b9623d09 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/patent_summary @@ -0,0 +1,100 @@ +These are the patents the Netpbm maintainer knows about that relate to +Netpbm. It is basically just information the maintainer has stumbled +over at some point -- no search has been done. + +No licenses have been granted by patent owners to the maintainer of +Netpbm. Therefore, if you need a patent to use something in Netpbm, +you need your own license. + +A note about patents in general: A patent gives an inventor the +exclusive right to make, sell, or use the invention. If you +independently invent something without knowing that the patent holder +already did, that makes no difference -- the patent holder still has +the exclusive right. It makes no difference if you give the original +inventor credit. The patent applies to a method, not its expression, +so writing a program from scratch to implement a certain method is +still a patent infringement. Infringing a patent is not a crime per +se, but to the extent that it costs the patent holder money, the +infringer has to make it up. + +The original purpose of patents is probably perverted when patents are +applied to things you implement in computer programs. This is one of +the Free Software Foundation's causes. See +<http://www.gnu.org/philosophy.html#laws>. + +The Jbigtopnm and Pnmtojbig programs use arithmetic coding patents and +other patents covering various aspects of the "front end." + + +JPEG patents +------------ + +The Pnmtojpeg and possibly Jpegtopnm programs in some cases may use +the arithmetic coding patents owned by IBM, AT&T, and Mitsubishi. +There is difference of opinion on whether they do. + +Forgent owns a patent it believes covers JPEG compression. This +patent was virtually unknown before July 2002, when Forgent began to +enforce it. It has successfully enforced it against two companies +(Sony and an unnamed Japanese digital camera maker), but without court +ruling. This patent, U.S. Patent No. 4,698,672, expires in 2006. + +Philips and Lucent Technologies also own patents they claim cover +JPEG. + +The following Netpbm components may be restricted by these patents: +Jpegtopnm, Pnmtojpeg, Ppmtompeg, Tifftopnm, Pnmtotiff. These all +do their JPEG work via a JPEG library not distributed with Netpbm. +Your JPEG-related liability for using Netpbm is limited to your +liability for using your JPEG library. + +Note that it is possible to use Ppmtompeg without involving JPEG and to +build it without the ability to involve JPEG. + +The next best alternative to JPEG is probably PNG and maybe JBIG for +bilevel (black and white) images. + +http://burnalljpegs.org contains information on this issue. + + +MPEG patents +------------ + +The original University of California distribution of the Ppmtompeg code +contains this statement in a README file: + + ... patents are held by several companies on various aspects of the MPEG + video standard. Companies or individuals who want to develop commercial + products that include this code must acquire licenses from these companies. + For information on licensing, see Appendix F in the standard. + + +Expired LZW patents +------------------- + +Unisys owns patents on LZW compression, which is used by +Ppmtogif, and maybe on LZW decompression, which is used by Giftopnm. IBM also +owns a patent that may cover the GIF tools. Unisys offers a license of the +patent for trivial use for $5000. Its U.S. patent (Number 4,558,302) expired +June 20, 2003. In most of Europe, the patent expired June 18, 2004. In +Japan, it was June 20, 2004 and in Canada, July 7, 2004. IBM's U.S. patent +expired August 11, 2006. + +Neither company has ever enforced the patent against trivial users of +it. <http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-1713278.html> is an article +dated April 18, 2000 on the issue. +http://www.unisys.com/about__unisys/lzw/> is Unisys' view of the +matter. For information from another perspective, see +<http://burnallgifs.org>. + +The following Netpbm components may be restricted by these patents: +Ppmtogif, Giftopnm. + +A good substitute for GIF if the patents are a problem is PNG (see +pngtopnm, pnmtopng), which was developed with a primary purpose of not +using any patented technology. + +You can also use the -nolzw option on ppmtogif to avoid using the LZW +patent. The images so generated are larger than traditional +LZW-compressed GIFs, but any GIF decoder can decode them just the +same. |