45737 (+ docs, and update the test from 45722): zstyle: When determining the weight (specificity) of a pattern, consider the number of components before anything else, as documented.

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/Doc/Zsh/mod_zutil.yo b/Doc/Zsh/mod_zutil.yo
index c69233f9d..9c50e6122 100644
--- a/Doc/Zsh/mod_zutil.yo
+++ b/Doc/Zsh/mod_zutil.yo
@@ -40,8 +40,8 @@ that it looks up the tt(preferred-precipitation) style under the
 `tt(:weather:)var(continent)tt(:)var(day-of-the-week)tt(:)var(phase-of-the-moon))' context.
 According to this, you might set the following in your tt(zshrc):
 
-example(zstyle ':weather:*:Sunday:*' preferred-precipitation snow
-zstyle ':weather:europe:*' preferred-precipitation rain)
+example(zstyle ':weather:europe:*' preferred-precipitation rain
+zstyle ':weather:*:Sunday:*' preferred-precipitation snow)
 
 Then the plugin would run under the hood a command such as
 
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ On Sundays tt($REPLY) would be set to `tt(snow)'; in Europe it would be set
 to `tt(rain)'; and on Sundays in Europe it would be set to `tt(snow)' again,
 because the patterns `tt(:weather:europe:*)' and `tt(:weather:*:Sunday:*)' both
 match the var(context) argument to tt(zstyle -s), are equally specific, and the
-latter was defined first.
+latter is more specific (because it has more colon-separated components).
 
 em(Usage)