| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
other cases with %x were probably broken too.
I would actually like to go ahead and replace this code in scanf with
calls to the new __intparse framework, but for now this calls for a
quick and unobtrusive fix without the risk of breaking other things.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
it should be noted that only the actual underlying buffer flush and
fill operations are cancellable, not reads from or writes to the
buffer. this behavior is compatible with POSIX, which makes all
cancellation points in stdio optional, and it achieves the goal of
allowing cancellation of a thread that's "stuck" on IO (due to a
non-responsive socket/pipe peer, slow/stuck hardware, etc.) without
imposing any measurable performance cost.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
passing null pointer for %s is UB but lots of broken programs do it anyway
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
for now this is just a tiny optimization, but later if we support
cancellation from __stdio_read and __stdio_write, it will be necessary
for the recusrive lock count to be zero in order for these functions
to know they are responsible for unlocking the FILE on cancellation.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
null termination is only added when current size grows.
in update modes, null termination is not added if it does not fit
(i.e. it is not allowed to clobber data).
these rules make very little sense, but that's how it goes..
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
read should not be allowed past "current size".
append mode should write at "current size", not buffer size.
null termination should not be written except when "current size" grows.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
disallow seek past end of buffer (per posix)
fix position accounting to include data buffered for read
don't set eof flag when no data was requested
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
the addition is safe and cannot overflow because both operands are
positive when considered as signed quantities.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
the expression -off is not safe in case off is the most-negative
value. instead apply - to base which is known to be non-negative and
bounded within sanity.
|
| |
|
|
| |
testing so far has been minimal. may need further work.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
not heavily tested, but it seems to be correct, including the odd
behavior that seeking is in terms of wide character count. this
precludes any simple buffering, so we just make the stream unbuffered.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
this is the first attempt, and may have bugs. only minimal testing has
been performed.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
previously, stdio used spinlocks, which would be unacceptable if we
ever add support for thread priorities, and which yielded
pathologically bad performance if an application attempted to use
flockfile on a key file as a major/primary locking mechanism.
i had held off on making this change for fear that it would hurt
performance in the non-threaded case, but actually support for
recursive locking had already inflicted that cost. by having the
internal locking functions store a flag indicating whether they need
to perform unlocking, rather than using the actual recursive lock
counter, i was able to combine the conditionals at unlock time,
eliminating any additional cost, and also avoid a nasty corner case
where a huge number of calls to ftrylockfile could cause deadlock
later at the point of internal locking.
this commit also fixes some issues with usage of pthread_self
conflicting with __attribute__((const)) which resulted in crashes with
some compiler versions/optimizations, mainly in flockfile prior to
pthread_create.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
fread was calling f->read without checking that the file was in
reading mode. this could:
1. crash, if f->read was a null pointer
2. cause unwanted blocking on a terminal already at eof
3. allow reading on a write-only file
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
hopefully this resolves the rest of the issues with hideously
nonportable hacks in programs that use gnulib.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
this is a really ugly and backwards function, but its presence will
prevent lots of broken gnulib software from trying to define its own
version of fpurge and thereby failing to build or worse.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
the observed symptom was that the code was incorrectly rounding up
1.0625 to 1.063 despite the rounding mode being round-to-nearest with
ties broken by rounding to even last place. however, the code was just
not right in many respects, and i'm surprised it worked as well as it
did. this time i tested the values that end up in the variables round,
small, and the expression round+small, and all look good.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
these should be tweaked according to testing. offhand i know 1000 is
too low and 5000 is likely to be sufficiently high. consider trying to
add futexes to file locking, too...
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
the previous fix was incorrect, as it would prevent f->close(f) from
being called if fflush(f) failed. i believe this was the original
motivation for using | rather than ||. so now let's just use a second
statement to constrain the order of function calls, and to back to
using |.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
pcc turned up this bug by calling f->close(f) before fflush(f),
resulting in lost output and error on flush.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
1. failed match of literal chars from the format string would always
return matching failure rather than input failure at eof, leading to
infinite loops in some programs.
2. unread of eof would wrongly adjust the character counts reported by
%n, yielding an off-by-one error.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
don't waste time (and significant code size due to function call
overhead!) setting errno when the result of a syscall does not matter
or when it can't fail.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
setting errno here is completely valid, but some programs, notably
busybox printf, assume that errno will not be set during output and
treat this as an error condition. in any case, skipping it slightly
reduces code size and saves time.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
according to posix, readv "shall be equivalent to read(), except..."
that it places the data into the buffers specified by the iov array.
however on linux, when reading from a terminal, each iov element
behaves almost like a separate read. this means that if the first iov
exactly satisfied the request (e.g. a length-one read of '\n') and the
second iov is nonzero length, the syscall will block again after
getting the blank line from the terminal until another line is read.
simply put, entering a single blank line becomes impossible.
the solution, fortunately, is simple. whenever the buffer size is
nonzero, reduce the length of the requested read by one byte and let
the last byte go through the buffer. this way, readv will already be
in the second (and last) iov, and won't re-block on the second iov.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
since vfprintf will provide a temporary buffer in the case where the
target FILE has a zero buffer size, don't bother setting up a real
buffer for vdprintf. this also allows us to skip the call to fflush
since we know everything will be written out before vfprintf returns.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
this change makes it so most calls to fprintf(stderr, ...) will result
in a single writev syscall, as opposed to roughly 2*N syscalls (and
possibly more) where N is the number of format specifiers. in
principle we could use a much larger buffer, but it's best not to
increase the stack requirements too much. most messages are under 80
chars.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
this could cause problems if the application uses dup2(fd,fileno(f))
to redirect, and the old fd was not seekable but the new fd is.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
