about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/src/process
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
...
* overhaul cancellation to fix resource leaks and dangerous behavior with signalsRich Felker2011-03-242-2/+14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | this commit addresses two issues: 1. a race condition, whereby a cancellation request occurring after a syscall returned from kernelspace but before the subsequent CANCELPT_END would cause cancellable resource-allocating syscalls (like open) to leak resources. 2. signal handlers invoked while the thread was blocked at a cancellation point behaved as if asynchronous cancellation mode wer in effect, resulting in potentially dangerous state corruption if a cancellation request occurs. the glibc/nptl implementation of threads shares both of these issues. with this commit, both are fixed. however, cancellation points encountered in a signal handler will not be acted upon if the signal was received while the thread was already at a cancellation point. they will of course be acted upon after the signal handler returns, so in real-world usage where signal handlers quickly return, it should not be a problem. it's possible to solve this problem too by having sigaction() wrap all signal handlers with a function that uses a pthread_cleanup handler to catch cancellation, patch up the saved context, and return into the cancellable function that will catch and act upon the cancellation. however that would be a lot of complexity for minimal if any benefit...
* global cleanup to use the new syscall interfaceRich Felker2011-03-205-7/+7
|
* make fork properly initialize the main thread in the child processRich Felker2011-03-091-0/+7
|
* implement fexecveRich Felker2011-02-271-0/+10
|
* add pthread_atfork interfaceRich Felker2011-02-181-3/+6
| | | | | | | | | note that this presently does not handle consistency of the libc's own global state during forking. as per POSIX 2008, if the parent process was threaded, the child process may only call async-signal-safe functions until one of the exec-family functions is called, so the current behavior is believed to be conformant even if non-ideal. it may be improved at some later time.
* initial check-in, version 0.5.0 v0.5.0Rich Felker2011-02-1212-0/+194