| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
| |
riscv32 and future architectures only provide prlimit64.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
resource limits have been process-wide since linux 2.6.10, and the
prlimit syscall was added in 2.6.36, so prlimit can be assumed to set
the resource limits correctly for the whole process.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
the LFS64 macro was not self-documenting and barely saved any
characters. simply use weak_alias directly so that it's clear what's
being done, and doesn't depend on a header to provide a strange macro.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
in the current version of __synccall, the callback is always run, so
failure to handle this case did not matter. however, the upcoming
overhaul of __synccall will have failure cases, in which case the
callback does not run and errno is already set. the changes being
committed now are in preparation for that.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
On 32 bit mips the kernel uses -1UL/2 to mark RLIM_INFINITY (and
this is the definition in the userspace api), but since it is in
the middle of the valid range of limits and limits are often
compared with relational operators, various kernel side logic is
broken if larger than -1UL/2 limits are used. So we truncate the
limits to -1UL/2 in get/setrlimit and prlimit.
Even if the kernel side logic consistently treated -1UL/2 as greater
than any other limit value, there wouldn't be any clean workaround
that allowed using large limits:
* using -1UL/2 as RLIM_INFINITY in userspace would mean different
infinity value for get/setrlimt and prlimit (where infinity is always
-1ULL) and userspace logic could break easily (just like the kernel
is broken now) and more special case code would be needed for mips.
* translating -1UL/2 kernel side value to -1ULL in userspace would
mean that -1UL/2 limit cannot be set (eg. -1UL/2+1 had to be passed
to the kernel instead).
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
this allows the full range of 64-bit limit arguments even on 32-bit
systems. fallback to the old syscalls on old kernels that don't
support prlimit.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
setrlimit is supposed to be per-process, not per-thread, but again
linux gets it wrong. work around this in userspace. not only is it
needed for correctness; setxid also depends on the resource limits for
all threads being the same to avoid situations where temporarily
unlimiting the limit succeeds in some threads but fails in others.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
