| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
the implicit-operand form of fucomip is rejected by binutils 2.19 and
perhaps other versions still in use. writing both operands explicitly
fixes the issue. there is no change to the resulting output.
commit a732e80d33b4fd6f510f7cec4f5573ef5d89bc4e was the source of this
regression.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Some early x86_64 cpus (released before 2006) did not support sahf/lahf
instructions so they should be avoided (intel manual says they are only
supported if CPUID.80000001H:ECX.LAHF-SAHF[bit 0] = 1).
The workaround simplifies exp2l and expm1l because fucomip can be
used instead of the fucomp;fnstsw;sahf sequence copied from i386.
In fmodl and remainderl sahf is replaced by a simple bit test.
|
| |
|
|
| |
copy the fix from i386: return -1 instead of exp2l(x)-1 when x <= -65
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
there were two problems:
* omitted underflow on subnormal results: exp2l(-16383.5) was calculated
as sqrt(2)*2^-16384, the last bits of sqrt(2) are zero so the down scaling
does not underflow eventhough the result is in subnormal range
* spurious underflow for subnormal inputs: exp2l(0x1p-16400) was evaluated
as f2xm1(x)+1 and f2xm1 raised underflow (because inexact subnormal result)
the first issue is fixed by raising underflow manually if x is in
(-32768,-16382] and not integer (x-0x1p63+0x1p63 != x)
the second issue is fixed by treating x in (-0x1p64,0x1p64) specially
for these fixes the special case handling was completely rewritten
|
| | |
|
|
|
this has not been tested heavily, but it's known to at least assemble
and run in basic usage cases. it's nearly identical to the
corresponding i386 code, and thus expected to be just as correct or
just as incorrect.
|
