avoid "inline" in public headers for strict c89 compatibility

while musl itself requires a c99 compiler, some applications insist on
being compiled with c89 compilers, and use of "inline" in the headers
was breaking them. much of this had been avoided already by just
skipping the inline keyword in pre-c99 compilers or modes, but this
new unified solution is cleaner and may/should result in better code
generation in the default gcc configuration.

1 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions

diff --git a/arch/arm/bits/syscall.h b/arch/arm/bits/syscall.h
index 9932c9e5..c5e25b76 100644
--- a/arch/arm/bits/syscall.h
+++ b/arch/arm/bits/syscall.h
@@ -7,37 +7,37 @@
 
 long (__syscall)(long, ...);
 
-static inline long __syscall0(long n)
+static __inline long __syscall0(long n)
 {
 	return (__syscall)(n);
 }
 
-static inline long __syscall1(long n, long a)
+static __inline long __syscall1(long n, long a)
 {
 	return (__syscall)(n, a);
 }
 
-static inline long __syscall2(long n, long a, long b)
+static __inline long __syscall2(long n, long a, long b)
 {
 	return (__syscall)(n, a, b);
 }
 
-static inline long __syscall3(long n, long a, long b, long c)
+static __inline long __syscall3(long n, long a, long b, long c)
 {
 	return (__syscall)(n, a, b, c);
 }
 
-static inline long __syscall4(long n, long a, long b, long c, long d)
+static __inline long __syscall4(long n, long a, long b, long c, long d)
 {
 	return (__syscall)(n, a, b, c, d);
 }
 
-static inline long __syscall5(long n, long a, long b, long c, long d, long e)
+static __inline long __syscall5(long n, long a, long b, long c, long d, long e)
 {
 	return (__syscall)(n, a, b, c, d, e);
 }
 
-static inline long __syscall6(long n, long a, long b, long c, long d, long e, long f)
+static __inline long __syscall6(long n, long a, long b, long c, long d, long e, long f)
 {
 	return (__syscall)(n, a, b, c, d, e, f);
 }