From bbe199b27aa52fc407db3372af00c3e9ffa20d1d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Adhemerval Zanella Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 13:51:42 -0300 Subject: microblaze: Use the correct select syscall (BZ #28883) On Microblaze only __NR_newselect is implemented, even though kernel advertise __NR_select on asm/unistd.h. Since microblaze is the only architecture that undef __ASSUME_PSELECT, the generic code change is simpler than chaging the architecture syscall number. Acked-by: Mark Hatle --- sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/select.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'sysdeps/unix') diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/select.c b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/select.c index 3bc8b0cc3d..a3f0a2eba7 100644 --- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/select.c +++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/select.c @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ __select64 (int nfds, fd_set *readfds, fd_set *writefds, fd_set *exceptfds, ptv32 = &tv32; } - int r = SYSCALL_CANCEL (select, nfds, readfds, writefds, exceptfds, ptv32); + int r = SYSCALL_CANCEL (_newselect, nfds, readfds, writefds, exceptfds, ptv32); if (timeout != NULL) *timeout = valid_timeval_to_timeval64 (tv32); return r; -- cgit 1.4.1