From ba4e688461a0e3171a6c515040ec9200319070b6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Siddhesh Poyarekar Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 00:34:26 +0530 Subject: Check n instead of k1 to decide on sign of sin/cos result For k1 in 1 and 3, n can only have values of 0 and 2, so checking k1 & 2 is equivalent to checking n & 2. We prefer the latter so that we don't use k1 for anything other than selecting the quadrant in do_sincos_1, thus dropping it completely. The previous logic was: "Compute sine for the value and based on the new rotated quadrant (k1) negate the value if we're in the fourth quadrant." With this change, the logic now is: "Compute sine for the value and negate it if we were either (1) in the fourth quadrant or (2) we actually wanted the cosine and were in the third quadrant." * sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/s_sin.c (do_sincos_1): Check N instead of K1. --- sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/s_sin.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'sysdeps/ieee754') diff --git a/sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/s_sin.c b/sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/s_sin.c index 76cf99619a..67bdebfd6c 100644 --- a/sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/s_sin.c +++ b/sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/s_sin.c @@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ do_sincos_1 (double a, double da, double x, int4 n, bool shift_quadrant) case 3: res = do_cos (a, da, &cor); cor = 1.025 * cor + __copysign (eps, cor); - retval = ((res == res + cor) ? ((k1 & 2) ? -res : res) + retval = ((res == res + cor) ? ((n & 2) ? -res : res) : sloww2 (a, da, x, n)); break; } -- cgit 1.4.1