From e186536b6fa8ceb004dfa1ba45766edcc871a95b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Metcalf Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 13:27:09 -0500 Subject: test-fpucw-ieee: Don't use _FPU_IEEE if not defined Not all architectures define this value, and if they don't, just let the test run the same as test-fpucw, with __fpu_control set to _FPU_DEFAULT explicitly. --- math/test-fpucw-ieee.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'math') diff --git a/math/test-fpucw-ieee.c b/math/test-fpucw-ieee.c index ae5fc73f6e..7596486252 100644 --- a/math/test-fpucw-ieee.c +++ b/math/test-fpucw-ieee.c @@ -16,9 +16,12 @@ License along with the GNU C Library; if not, see . */ -#define FPU_CONTROL _FPU_IEEE +#ifdef _FPU_IEEE +/* Some architectures don't have _FPU_IEEE. */ +# define FPU_CONTROL _FPU_IEEE +#endif #include "test-fpucw.c" /* Preempt the library's definition of `__fpu_control'. */ -fpu_control_t __fpu_control = _FPU_IEEE; +fpu_control_t __fpu_control = FPU_CONTROL; -- cgit 1.4.1