From 0ecb606cb6cf65de1d9fc8a919bceb4be476c602 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 18:26:36 +0000
Subject: 2.5-18.1

---
 localedata/locales/de_DE | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

(limited to 'localedata/locales/de_DE')

diff --git a/localedata/locales/de_DE b/localedata/locales/de_DE
index 93fded8b2a..8c6fe41eb2 100644
--- a/localedata/locales/de_DE
+++ b/localedata/locales/de_DE
@@ -57,6 +57,19 @@ include "translit_combining";""
 % LATIN SMALL LETTER A WITH RING ABOVE.
 <U00E5> "<U0061><U030A>";"<U0061><U0061>"
 
+% The following strange first-level transliteration derive from the use
+% U201E and U201C as "correct" quoting characters.  These two characters
+% do not really belong together.  The result is that somebody who uses
+% U201C and U201D will get the incorrect U00AB / U00BB sequences.
+% LEFT DOUBLE QUOTATION MARK
+<U201C> <U00AB>;<U0022>
+% RIGHT DOUBLE QUOTATION MARK
+<U201D> <U00BB>;<U0022>
+% DOUBLE LOW-9 QUOTATION MARK
+<U201E> <U00BB>;"<U002C><U002C>"
+% DOUBLE HIGH-REVERSED-9 QUOTATION MARK
+<U201F> <U00AB>;<U0022>
+
 translit_end
 
 END LC_CTYPE
@@ -137,9 +150,9 @@ d_fmt   "<U0025><U0064><U002E><U0025><U006D><U002E><U0025><U0059>"
 %	"%T"
 t_fmt   "<U0025><U0054>"
 t_fmt_ampm ""
-date_fmt	"<U0025><U0061><U0020><U0025><U0062><U0020><U0025><U0065>/
-<U0020><U0025><U0048><U003A><U0025><U004D><U003A><U0025><U0053><U0020>/
-<U0025><U005A><U0020><U0025><U0059>"
+date_fmt	"<U0025><U0061><U0020><U0025><U002D><U0064><U002E><U0020>/
+<U0025><U0062><U0020><U0025><U0048><U003A><U0025><U004D><U003A><U0025><U0053>/
+<U0020><U0025><U005A><U0020><U0025><U0059>"
 END LC_TIME
 
 LC_MESSAGES
-- 
cgit 1.4.1