From b2bcd61a998237708b86c601844fe9585a26cf9c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ulrich Drepper Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 16:33:05 +0000 Subject: Update. 1999-07-12 Andreas Schwab * elf/rtld.c (dl_main): When putting back the interpreter object handle the case where a missing object might occur in the list of objects but not in the search list when in trace mode. --- elf/rtld.c | 15 ++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'elf/rtld.c') diff --git a/elf/rtld.c b/elf/rtld.c index 4146c0e9bf..33c26269fc 100644 --- a/elf/rtld.c +++ b/elf/rtld.c @@ -798,9 +798,18 @@ of this helper program; chances are you did not intend to run this program.\n\ while (_dl_loaded->l_searchlist.r_list[i] != &_dl_rtld_map) ++i; _dl_rtld_map.l_prev = _dl_loaded->l_searchlist.r_list[i - 1]; - _dl_rtld_map.l_next = (i + 1 < _dl_loaded->l_searchlist.r_nlist - ? _dl_loaded->l_searchlist.r_list[i + 1] - : NULL); + if (__builtin_expect (mode, normal) == normal) + _dl_rtld_map.l_next = (i + 1 < _dl_loaded->l_searchlist.r_nlist + ? _dl_loaded->l_searchlist.r_list[i + 1] + : NULL); + else + /* In trace mode there might be an invisible object (which we + could not find) after the previous one in the search list. + In this case it doesn't matter much where we put the + interpreter object, so we just initialize the list pointer so + that the assertion below holds. */ + _dl_rtld_map.l_next = _dl_rtld_map.l_prev->l_next; + assert (_dl_rtld_map.l_prev->l_next == _dl_rtld_map.l_next); _dl_rtld_map.l_prev->l_next = &_dl_rtld_map; if (_dl_rtld_map.l_next) -- cgit 1.4.1