From dfe2e7a5627f2c7bdc298fc714dbf12f7666fa2a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2020 14:06:56 +0000
Subject: bsd unlockpt: unlockpt needs to fail with EINVAL, not ENOTTY

The EINVAL error code is mandated by POSIX, while ptsname_r returns
ENOTTY, so we need to translate.
---
 sysdeps/unix/bsd/unlockpt.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/bsd/unlockpt.c b/sysdeps/unix/bsd/unlockpt.c
index d8b7f0cae7..e609685c2f 100644
--- a/sysdeps/unix/bsd/unlockpt.c
+++ b/sysdeps/unix/bsd/unlockpt.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
 #include <stdlib.h>
 #include <string.h>
 #include <unistd.h>
+#include <errno.h>
 
 
 /* Unlock the slave pseudo terminal associated with the master pseudo
@@ -31,6 +32,10 @@ unlockpt (int fd)
 
   /* BSD doesn't have a lock, but it does have `revoke'.  */
   if (__ptsname_r (fd, buf, sizeof (buf)))
-    return -1;
+    {
+      if (errno == ENOTTY)
+	__set_errno (EINVAL);
+      return -1;
+    }
   return __revoke (buf);
 }
-- 
cgit 1.4.1