| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I used these shell commands:
../glibc/scripts/update-copyrights $PWD/../gnulib/build-aux/update-copyright
(cd ../glibc && git commit -am"[this commit message]")
and then ignored the output, which consisted lines saying "FOO: warning:
copyright statement not found" for each of 7061 files FOO.
I then removed trailing white space from math/tgmath.h,
support/tst-support-open-dev-null-range.c, and
sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/strlen-vec.S, to work around the following
obscure pre-commit check failure diagnostics from Savannah. I don't
know why I run into these diagnostics whereas others evidently do not.
remote: *** 912-#endif
remote: *** 913:
remote: *** 914-
remote: *** error: lines with trailing whitespace found
...
remote: *** error: sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/statx_cp.c: trailing lines
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I used these shell commands:
../glibc/scripts/update-copyrights $PWD/../gnulib/build-aux/update-copyright
(cd ../glibc && git commit -am"[this commit message]")
and then ignored the output, which consisted lines saying "FOO: warning:
copyright statement not found" for each of 6694 files FOO.
I then removed trailing white space from benchtests/bench-pthread-locks.c
and iconvdata/tst-iconv-big5-hkscs-to-2ucs4.c, to work around this
diagnostic from Savannah:
remote: *** pre-commit check failed ...
remote: *** error: lines with trailing whitespace found
remote: error: hook declined to update refs/heads/master
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Re-mmap executable segments if possible instead of using mprotect
to add PROT_BTI. This allows using BTI protection with security
policies that prevent mprotect with PROT_EXEC.
If the fd of the ELF module is not available because it was kernel
mapped then mprotect is used and failures are ignored. To protect
the main executable even when mprotect is filtered the linux kernel
will have to be changed to add PROT_BTI to it.
The delayed failure reporting is mainly needed because currently
_dl_process_gnu_properties does not propagate failures such that
the required cleanups happen. Using the link_map_machine struct for
error propagation is not ideal, but this seemed to be the least
intrusive solution.
Fixes bug 26831.
Reviewed-by: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Handle unaligned executable load segments (the bfd linker is not
expected to produce such binaries, but other linkers may).
Computing the mapping bounds follows _dl_map_object_from_fd more
closely now.
Fixes bug 26988.
Reviewed-by: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The _dl_open_check and _rtld_main_check hooks are not called on the
dependencies of a loaded module, so BTI protection was missed on
every module other than the main executable and directly dlopened
libraries.
The fix just iterates over dependencies to enable BTI.
Fixes bug 26926.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Use PROT_READ and PROT_WRITE according to the load segment p_flags
when adding PROT_BTI.
This is before processing relocations which may drop PROT_BTI in
case of textrels. Executable stacks are not protected via PROT_BTI
either. PROT_BTI is hardening in case memory corruption happened,
it's value is reduced if there is writable and executable memory
available so missing it on such memory is fine, but we should
respect the p_flags and should not drop PROT_WRITE.
|
|
|
Binaries can opt-in to using BTI via an ELF object file marking.
The dynamic linker has to then mprotect the executable segments
with PROT_BTI. In case of static linked executables or in case
of the dynamic linker itself, PROT_BTI protection is done by the
operating system.
On AArch64 glibc uses PT_GNU_PROPERTY instead of PT_NOTE to check
the properties of a binary because PT_NOTE can be unreliable with
old linkers (old linkers just append the notes of input objects
together and add them to the output without checking them for
consistency which means multiple incompatible GNU property notes
can be present in PT_NOTE).
BTI property is handled in the loader even if glibc is not built
with BTI support, so in theory user code can be BTI protected
independently of glibc. In practice though user binaries are not
marked with the BTI property if glibc has no support because the
static linked libc objects (crt files, libc_nonshared.a) are
unmarked.
This patch relies on Linux userspace API that is not yet in a
linux release but in v5.8-rc1 so scheduled to be in Linux 5.8.
Co-authored-by: Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
|
