about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/REORG.TODO/sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/strlen.S
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'REORG.TODO/sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/strlen.S')
-rw-r--r--REORG.TODO/sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/strlen.S203
1 files changed, 203 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/REORG.TODO/sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/strlen.S b/REORG.TODO/sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/strlen.S
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..1466624c6a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/REORG.TODO/sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/strlen.S
@@ -0,0 +1,203 @@
+/* Optimized strlen implementation for PowerPC64.
+   Copyright (C) 1997-2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+   This file is part of the GNU C Library.
+
+   The GNU C Library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+   modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
+   License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
+   version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
+
+   The GNU C Library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+   but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+   MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
+   Lesser General Public License for more details.
+
+   You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
+   License along with the GNU C Library; if not, see
+   <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.  */
+
+#include <sysdep.h>
+
+/* The algorithm here uses the following techniques:
+
+   1) Given a word 'x', we can test to see if it contains any 0 bytes
+      by subtracting 0x01010101, and seeing if any of the high bits of each
+      byte changed from 0 to 1. This works because the least significant
+      0 byte must have had no incoming carry (otherwise it's not the least
+      significant), so it is 0x00 - 0x01 == 0xff. For all other
+      byte values, either they have the high bit set initially, or when
+      1 is subtracted you get a value in the range 0x00-0x7f, none of which
+      have their high bit set. The expression here is
+      (x + 0xfefefeff) & ~(x | 0x7f7f7f7f), which gives 0x00000000 when
+      there were no 0x00 bytes in the word.  You get 0x80 in bytes that
+      match, but possibly false 0x80 matches in the next more significant
+      byte to a true match due to carries.  For little-endian this is
+      of no consequence since the least significant match is the one
+      we're interested in, but big-endian needs method 2 to find which
+      byte matches.
+
+   2) Given a word 'x', we can test to see _which_ byte was zero by
+      calculating ~(((x & 0x7f7f7f7f) + 0x7f7f7f7f) | x | 0x7f7f7f7f).
+      This produces 0x80 in each byte that was zero, and 0x00 in all
+      the other bytes. The '| 0x7f7f7f7f' clears the low 7 bits in each
+      byte, and the '| x' part ensures that bytes with the high bit set
+      produce 0x00. The addition will carry into the high bit of each byte
+      iff that byte had one of its low 7 bits set. We can then just see
+      which was the most significant bit set and divide by 8 to find how
+      many to add to the index.
+      This is from the book 'The PowerPC Compiler Writer's Guide',
+      by Steve Hoxey, Faraydon Karim, Bill Hay and Hank Warren.
+
+   We deal with strings not aligned to a word boundary by taking the
+   first word and ensuring that bytes not part of the string
+   are treated as nonzero. To allow for memory latency, we unroll the
+   loop a few times, being careful to ensure that we do not read ahead
+   across cache line boundaries.
+
+   Questions to answer:
+   1) How long are strings passed to strlen? If they're often really long,
+   we should probably use cache management instructions and/or unroll the
+   loop more. If they're often quite short, it might be better to use
+   fact (2) in the inner loop than have to recalculate it.
+   2) How popular are bytes with the high bit set? If they are very rare,
+   on some processors it might be useful to use the simpler expression
+   ~((x - 0x01010101) | 0x7f7f7f7f) (that is, on processors with only one
+   ALU), but this fails when any character has its high bit set.
+
+   Answer:
+   1) Added a Data Cache Block Touch early to prefetch the first 128
+   byte cache line. Adding dcbt instructions to the loop would not be
+   effective since most strings will be shorter than the cache line.  */
+
+/* Some notes on register usage: Under the SVR4 ABI, we can use registers
+   0 and 3 through 12 (so long as we don't call any procedures) without
+   saving them. We can also use registers 14 through 31 if we save them.
+   We can't use r1 (it's the stack pointer), r2 nor r13 because the user
+   program may expect them to hold their usual value if we get sent
+   a signal. Integer parameters are passed in r3 through r10.
+   We can use condition registers cr0, cr1, cr5, cr6, and cr7 without saving
+   them, the others we must save.  */
+
+/* int [r3] strlen (char *s [r3])  */
+
+#ifndef STRLEN
+# define STRLEN strlen
+#endif
+
+ENTRY (STRLEN)
+	CALL_MCOUNT 1
+
+#define rTMP4	r0
+#define rRTN	r3	/* incoming STR arg, outgoing result */
+#define rSTR	r4	/* current string position */
+#define rPADN	r5	/* number of padding bits we prepend to the
+			   string to make it start at a word boundary */
+#define rFEFE	r6	/* constant 0xfefefefefefefeff (-0x0101010101010101) */
+#define r7F7F	r7	/* constant 0x7f7f7f7f7f7f7f7f */
+#define rWORD1	r8	/* current string doubleword */
+#define rWORD2	r9	/* next string doubleword */
+#define rMASK	r9	/* mask for first string doubleword */
+#define rTMP1	r10
+#define rTMP2	r11
+#define rTMP3	r12
+
+	dcbt	0,rRTN
+	clrrdi	rSTR, rRTN, 3
+	lis	r7F7F, 0x7f7f
+	rlwinm	rPADN, rRTN, 3, 26, 28
+	ld	rWORD1, 0(rSTR)
+	addi	r7F7F, r7F7F, 0x7f7f
+	li	rMASK, -1
+	insrdi	r7F7F, r7F7F, 32, 0
+/* We use method (2) on the first two doublewords, because rFEFE isn't
+   required which reduces setup overhead.  Also gives a faster return
+   for small strings on big-endian due to needing to recalculate with
+   method (2) anyway.  */
+#ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN__
+	sld	rMASK, rMASK, rPADN
+#else
+	srd	rMASK, rMASK, rPADN
+#endif
+	and	rTMP1, r7F7F, rWORD1
+	or	rTMP2, r7F7F, rWORD1
+	lis	rFEFE, -0x101
+	add	rTMP1, rTMP1, r7F7F
+	addi	rFEFE, rFEFE, -0x101
+	nor	rTMP3, rTMP2, rTMP1
+	and.	rTMP3, rTMP3, rMASK
+	mtcrf	0x01, rRTN
+	bne	L(done0)
+	sldi	rTMP1, rFEFE, 32
+	add	rFEFE, rFEFE, rTMP1
+/* Are we now aligned to a doubleword boundary?  */
+	bt	28, L(loop)
+
+/* Handle second doubleword of pair.  */
+/* Perhaps use method (1) here for little-endian, saving one instruction?  */
+	ldu	rWORD1, 8(rSTR)
+	and	rTMP1, r7F7F, rWORD1
+	or	rTMP2, r7F7F, rWORD1
+	add	rTMP1, rTMP1, r7F7F
+	nor.	rTMP3, rTMP2, rTMP1
+	bne	L(done0)
+
+/* The loop.  */
+
+L(loop):
+	ld	rWORD1, 8(rSTR)
+	ldu	rWORD2, 16(rSTR)
+	add	rTMP1, rFEFE, rWORD1
+	nor	rTMP2, r7F7F, rWORD1
+	and.	rTMP1, rTMP1, rTMP2
+	add	rTMP3, rFEFE, rWORD2
+	nor	rTMP4, r7F7F, rWORD2
+	bne	L(done1)
+	and.	rTMP3, rTMP3, rTMP4
+	beq	L(loop)
+
+#ifndef __LITTLE_ENDIAN__
+	and	rTMP1, r7F7F, rWORD2
+	add	rTMP1, rTMP1, r7F7F
+	andc	rTMP3, rTMP4, rTMP1
+	b	L(done0)
+
+L(done1):
+	and	rTMP1, r7F7F, rWORD1
+	subi	rSTR, rSTR, 8
+	add	rTMP1, rTMP1, r7F7F
+	andc	rTMP3, rTMP2, rTMP1
+
+/* When we get to here, rSTR points to the first doubleword in the string that
+   contains a zero byte, and rTMP3 has 0x80 for bytes that are zero, and 0x00
+   otherwise.  */
+L(done0):
+	cntlzd	rTMP3, rTMP3
+	subf	rTMP1, rRTN, rSTR
+	srdi	rTMP3, rTMP3, 3
+	add	rRTN, rTMP1, rTMP3
+	blr
+#else
+
+L(done0):
+	addi	rTMP1, rTMP3, -1	/* Form a mask from trailing zeros.  */
+	andc	rTMP1, rTMP1, rTMP3
+	cntlzd	rTMP1, rTMP1		/* Count bits not in the mask.  */
+	subf	rTMP3, rRTN, rSTR
+	subfic	rTMP1, rTMP1, 64-7
+	srdi	rTMP1, rTMP1, 3
+	add	rRTN, rTMP1, rTMP3
+	blr
+
+L(done1):
+	addi	rTMP3, rTMP1, -1
+	andc	rTMP3, rTMP3, rTMP1
+	cntlzd	rTMP3, rTMP3
+	subf	rTMP1, rRTN, rSTR
+	subfic	rTMP3, rTMP3, 64-7-64
+	sradi	rTMP3, rTMP3, 3
+	add	rRTN, rTMP1, rTMP3
+	blr
+#endif
+
+END (STRLEN)
+libc_hidden_builtin_def (strlen)