about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/REORG.TODO/localedata/tests-mbwc/dat_strcoll.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'REORG.TODO/localedata/tests-mbwc/dat_strcoll.c')
-rw-r--r--REORG.TODO/localedata/tests-mbwc/dat_strcoll.c154
1 files changed, 154 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/REORG.TODO/localedata/tests-mbwc/dat_strcoll.c b/REORG.TODO/localedata/tests-mbwc/dat_strcoll.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..b729ae9e89
--- /dev/null
+++ b/REORG.TODO/localedata/tests-mbwc/dat_strcoll.c
@@ -0,0 +1,154 @@
+/*
+ *  TEST SUITE FOR MB/WC FUNCTIONS IN C LIBRARY
+ *
+ *	 FILE: dat_strcoll.c
+ *
+ *	 STRCOLL:  int strcoll (const char *s1, const char *s2);
+ */
+
+/*
+   NOTE:
+
+   If a return value is expected to be 0, set ret_flg=1 and the
+   expected value = 0.	If a return value is expected to be a
+   positive/negative value, set ret_flg=0, and set the expected value
+   = +1/-1.
+   There is inconsistensy between tst_strcoll() and tst_wcscoll()(it
+   has cmp_flg) for input data. I'll fix it.
+
+   Assuming en_US to be en_US.ascii. (maybe, should be iso8859-1).
+
+
+
+   ASCII CODE  : A,B,C, ...  , a, b, c, ...	 B,a:-1	  a,B:+1
+   DICTIONARY : A,a,B,b,C,c,....  a,B:-1 B,a:+1 */
+
+TST_STRCOLL tst_strcoll_loc [] = {
+  {
+    { Tstrcoll, TST_LOC_de },
+    {
+      { /*input.*/ { "ÄBCDEFG", "ÄBCDEFG"	      },  /* #1 */
+	/*expect*/ { 0,1,0,			      },
+      },
+      { /*input.*/ { "XX Ä XX", "XX B XX"	      },  /* #2 */
+	/*expect*/ { 0,0,-1,			      },
+      },
+      { /*input.*/ { "XX B XX", "XX Ä XX"	      },  /* #3 */
+	/*expect*/ { 0,0,+1,			      },
+      },
+      { /*input.*/ { "B",	"a"		      },  /* #4 */
+	/*expect*/ { 0,0,+1,			      },
+      },
+      { /*input.*/ { "a",	"B"		      },  /* #5 */
+	/*expect*/ { 0,0,-1,			      },
+      },
+      { /*input.*/ { "b",	"A"		      },  /* #6 */
+	/*expect*/ { 0,0,+1,			      },
+      },
+      { /*input.*/ { "A",	"b"		      },  /* #7 */
+	/*expect*/ { 0,0,-1,			      },
+      },
+      { /*input.*/ { "ä",	"B"		      },  /* #8 */
+	/*expect*/ { 0,0,-1,			      },
+      },
+      { /*input.*/ { "B",	"ä"		      },  /* #9 */
+	/*expect*/ { 0,0,+1,			      },
+      },
+      { .is_last = 1 } /* Last element.  */
+    }
+  },
+  {
+    { Tstrcoll, TST_LOC_enUS },
+    {
+      { /*input.*/ { "ABCDEFG", "ABCDEFG"	      },  /* #1 */
+	/*expect*/ { 0,1,0,			      },
+      },
+      { /*input.*/ { "XX a XX", "XX B XX"	      },  /* #2 */
+	/*expect*/ { 0,0,-1,			      },
+      },
+      { /*input.*/ { "XX B XX", "XX a XX"	      },  /* #3 */
+	/*expect*/ { 0,0,+1,			      },
+      },
+      {
+	/* <WAIVER> */
+	/*input.*/ { "B",	"a"		      },  /* #4 */
+		   /* XXX We are not testing the C locale.  */
+	/*expect*/ { 0,0,+1,			      },
+      },
+      {
+	/* <WAIVER> */
+	/*input.*/ { "a",	"B"		      },  /* #5 */
+		   /* XXX We are not testing the C locale.  */
+	/*expect*/ { 0,0,-1,			      },
+      },
+      { /*input.*/ { "b",	"A"		      },  /* #6 */
+	/*expect*/ { 0,0,+1,			      },
+      },
+      { /*input.*/ { "A",	"b"		      },  /* #7 */
+	/*expect*/ { 0,0,-1,			      },
+      },
+#ifdef NO_WAIVER
+      /* XXX I do not yet know whether strcoll really should reject
+	 characters outside the multibyte character range.  */
+      {
+	/* #8 */  /* <WAIVER> */
+	/*input.*/ { "\244\242\244\244\244\246\244\250\244\252", "ABCDEFG" },
+	/*expect*/ { EINVAL,0,0,		      },
+      },
+      {
+	/* #9 */  /* <WAIVER> */
+	/*input.*/ { "ABCZEFG", "\244\242\244\244\244\246\244\250\244\252" },
+	/*expect*/ { EINVAL,0,0,		      },
+      },
+#endif
+      { .is_last = 1 } /* Last element.  */
+    }
+  },
+  {
+    { Tstrcoll, TST_LOC_eucJP },
+    {
+      { /*input.*/ { "\244\242\244\244\244\246\244\250\244\252",
+		     "\244\242\244\244\244\246\244\250\244\252" },  /* #1 */
+	/*expect*/ { 0,1,0,			      },
+      },
+      { /*input.*/ { "\244\242\244\244\244\246\244\250\244\252",
+		     "\244\242\244\244\244\363\244\250\244\252" },  /* #2 */
+	/*expect*/ { 0,0,-1,			      },
+      },
+      { /*input.*/ { "\244\242\244\244\244\363\244\250\244\252",
+		     "\244\242\244\244\244\246\244\250\244\252" },  /* #3 */
+	/*expect*/ { 0,0,+1,			      },
+      },
+      { /*input.*/ { "B",	"a"		      },  /* #4 */
+	/*expect*/ { 0,0,-1,			      },
+      },
+      { /*input.*/ { "a",	"B"		      },  /* #5 */
+	/*expect*/ { 0,0,+1,			      },
+      },
+      { /*input.*/ { "b",	"A"		      },  /* #6 */
+	/*expect*/ { 0,0,+1,			      },
+      },
+      { /*input.*/ { "A",	"b"		      },  /* #7 */
+	/*expect*/ { 0,0,-1,			      },
+      },
+#ifdef NO_WAIVER
+      /* XXX I do not yet know whether strcoll really should reject
+	 characters outside the multibyte character range.  */
+      {
+	/* <WAIVER> */
+	/*input.*/ { "\200\216\217", "ABCDEFG"	      },  /* #8 */
+	/*expect*/ { EINVAL,0,0,		      },
+      },
+      {
+	/* <WAIVER> */
+	/*input.*/ { "ABCZEFG", "\200\216\217"	      },  /* #9 */
+	/*expect*/ { EINVAL,0,0,		      },
+      },
+#endif
+      { .is_last = 1 } /* Last element.  */
+    }
+  },
+  {
+    { Tstrcoll, TST_LOC_end }
+  }
+};