diff options
author | Stefan Liebler <stli@linux.ibm.com> | 2020-12-15 15:18:03 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Stefan Liebler <stli@linux.ibm.com> | 2020-12-17 16:18:04 +0100 |
commit | 844b4d8b4b937fe6943d2c0c80ce7d871cdb1eb5 (patch) | |
tree | e1b9009fe7c5b66a726fb47369b9da4d054521a9 /sysdeps/s390 | |
parent | 29a4db291b1282f4088e549391d86b6b470f22be (diff) | |
download | glibc-844b4d8b4b937fe6943d2c0c80ce7d871cdb1eb5.tar.gz glibc-844b4d8b4b937fe6943d2c0c80ce7d871cdb1eb5.tar.xz glibc-844b4d8b4b937fe6943d2c0c80ce7d871cdb1eb5.zip |
s390x: Require GCC 7.1 or later to build glibc.
GCC 6.5 fails to correctly build ldconfig with recent ld.so.cache commits, e.g.: 785969a047ad2f23f758901c6816422573544453 elf: Implement a string table for ldconfig, with tail merging If glibc is build with gcc 6.5.0: __builtin_add_overflow is used in <glibc>/elf/stringtable.c:stringtable_finalize() which leads to ldconfig failing with "String table is too large". This is also recognizable in following tests: FAIL: elf/tst-glibc-hwcaps-cache FAIL: elf/tst-glibc-hwcaps-prepend-cache FAIL: elf/tst-ldconfig-X FAIL: elf/tst-ldconfig-bad-aux-cache FAIL: elf/tst-ldconfig-ld_so_conf-update FAIL: elf/tst-stringtable See gcc "Bug 98269 - gcc 6.5.0 __builtin_add_overflow() with small uint32_t values incorrectly detects overflow" (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98269)
Diffstat (limited to 'sysdeps/s390')
-rw-r--r-- | sysdeps/s390/configure | 35 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | sysdeps/s390/configure.ac | 17 |
2 files changed, 52 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/sysdeps/s390/configure b/sysdeps/s390/configure index fa46e9e351..5f98640d0f 100644 --- a/sysdeps/s390/configure +++ b/sysdeps/s390/configure @@ -296,5 +296,40 @@ then fi + +{ $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking if $CC is sufficient to build libc on s390x" >&5 +$as_echo_n "checking if $CC is sufficient to build libc on s390x... " >&6; } +if ${libc_cv_compiler_ok_on_s390x+:} false; then : + $as_echo_n "(cached) " >&6 +else + +cat confdefs.h - <<_ACEOF >conftest.$ac_ext +/* end confdefs.h. */ + +int +main () +{ + +#if !defined __GNUC__ || __GNUC__ < 7 || (__GNUC__ == 7 && __GNUC_MINOR__ < 1) +#error insufficient compiler for building on s390x +#endif + + ; + return 0; +} +_ACEOF +if ac_fn_c_try_compile "$LINENO"; then : + libc_cv_compiler_ok_on_s390x=yes +else + libc_cv_compiler_ok_on_s390x=no +fi +rm -f core conftest.err conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext +fi +{ $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: result: $libc_cv_compiler_ok_on_s390x" >&5 +$as_echo "$libc_cv_compiler_ok_on_s390x" >&6; } +if test "$libc_cv_compiler_ok_on_s390x" != yes; then + critic_missing="$critic_missing On s390x, GCC >= 7.1.0 is required." +fi + test -n "$critic_missing" && as_fn_error $? " *** $critic_missing" "$LINENO" 5 diff --git a/sysdeps/s390/configure.ac b/sysdeps/s390/configure.ac index 3ed5a8ef87..dfe007a774 100644 --- a/sysdeps/s390/configure.ac +++ b/sysdeps/s390/configure.ac @@ -212,5 +212,22 @@ then AC_DEFINE(HAVE_S390_MIN_ARCH13_ZARCH_ASM_SUPPORT) fi +dnl test if GCC is new enough. See gcc "Bug 98269 - gcc 6.5.0 +dnl __builtin_add_overflow() with small uint32_t values incorrectly detects +dnl overflow +dnl (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98269) +AC_CACHE_CHECK([if $CC is sufficient to build libc on s390x], +libc_cv_compiler_ok_on_s390x, [ +AC_TRY_COMPILE([], [ +#if !defined __GNUC__ || __GNUC__ < 7 || (__GNUC__ == 7 && __GNUC_MINOR__ < 1) +#error insufficient compiler for building on s390x +#endif +], + [libc_cv_compiler_ok_on_s390x=yes], + [libc_cv_compiler_ok_on_s390x=no])]) +if test "$libc_cv_compiler_ok_on_s390x" != yes; then + critic_missing="$critic_missing On s390x, GCC >= 7.1.0 is required." +fi + test -n "$critic_missing" && AC_MSG_ERROR([ *** $critic_missing]) |