Improve generic strcspn performance

Improve strcspn performance using a much faster algorithm.  It is kept simple
so it works well on most targets.  It is generally at least 10 times faster
than the existing implementation on bench-strcspn on a few AArch64
implementations, and for some tests 100 times as fast (repeatedly calling
strchr on a small string is extremely slow...).

In fact the string/bits/string2.h inlines make no longer sense, as GCC
already uses strlen if reject is an empty string, strchrnul is 5 times as
fast as __strcspn_c1, while __strcspn_c2 and __strcspn_c3 are slower than
the strcspn main loop for large strings (though reject length 2-4 could be
special cased in the future to gain even more performance).

Tested on x86_64, i686, and aarch64.

	* string/Version (libc): Add GLIBC_2.24.
	* string/strcspn.c (strcspn): Rewrite function.
	* string/bits/string2.h (strcspn): Use __builtin_strcspn.
	(__strcspn_c1): Remove inline function.
	(__strcspn_c2): Likewise.
	(__strcspn_c3): Likewise.
	* string/string-inline.c
	[SHLIB_COMPAT(libc, GLIBC_2_1_1, GLIBC_2_24)] (__strcspn_c1): Add
	compatibility symbol.
	[SHLIB_COMPAT(libc, GLIBC_2_1_1, GLIBC_2_24)] (__strcspn_c2):
	Likewise.
	[SHLIB_COMPAT(libc, GLIBC_2_1_1, GLIBC_2_24)] (__strcspn_c3):
	Likewise.
	* sysdeps/i386/string-inlines.c: Include generic string-inlines.c.

1 files changed, 40 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/string/string-inlines.c b/string/string-inlines.c
index 16db3ea308..83bdd6c185 100644
--- a/string/string-inlines.c
+++ b/string/string-inlines.c
@@ -32,3 +32,43 @@
 #undef __NO_INLINE__
 #include <bits/string.h>
 #include <bits/string2.h>
+
+#include "shlib-compat.h"
+
+#if SHLIB_COMPAT (libc, GLIBC_2_1_1, GLIBC_2_24)
+/* The inline functions are not used from GLIBC 2.24 and forward, however
+   they are required to provide the symbols through string-inlines.c
+   (if inlining is not possible for compatibility reasons).  */
+size_t
+__old_strcspn_c1 (const char *__s, int __reject)
+{
+  size_t __result = 0;
+  while (__s[__result] != '\0' && __s[__result] != __reject)
+    ++__result;
+  return __result;
+}
+compat_symbol (libc, __old_strcspn_c1, __strcspn_c1, GLIBC_2_1_1);
+
+size_t
+__old_strcspn_c2 (const char *__s, int __reject1, int __reject2)
+{
+  size_t __result = 0;
+  while (__s[__result] != '\0' && __s[__result] != __reject1
+	 && __s[__result] != __reject2)
+    ++__result;
+  return __result;
+}
+compat_symbol (libc, __old_strcspn_c2, __strcspn_c2, GLIBC_2_1_1);
+
+size_t
+__old_strcspn_c3 (const char *__s, int __reject1, int __reject2,
+	      int __reject3)
+{
+  size_t __result = 0;
+  while (__s[__result] != '\0' && __s[__result] != __reject1
+	 && __s[__result] != __reject2 && __s[__result] != __reject3)
+    ++__result;
+  return __result;
+}
+compat_symbol (libc, __old_strcspn_c3, __strcspn_c3, GLIBC_2_1_1);
+#endif