diff options
author | Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> | 2018-11-01 17:20:27 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> | 2018-11-01 17:20:27 +0000 |
commit | eac4405af00464a4268cfd13b25224901c193988 (patch) | |
tree | b4ce145b9bceaf11d3a139ab8755aabad157a97f /nptl_db/td_ta_new.c | |
parent | 6f30e59fc9d9945a225de9b2c7b260ff64e72140 (diff) | |
download | glibc-eac4405af00464a4268cfd13b25224901c193988.tar.gz glibc-eac4405af00464a4268cfd13b25224901c193988.tar.xz glibc-eac4405af00464a4268cfd13b25224901c193988.zip |
Avoid printf ("%s", NULL) in posix/bug-regex22.c.
Building posix/bug-regex22.c fails with GCC mainline because of -Wformat-overflow= warnings for NULL arguments to %s formats. This is *not* testing how glibc handles such format arguments; in the context of the messages in question it makes no sense to pass NULL to such a %s format (the code passes s, inside "if (s == NULL)"). So this patch changes the code not to pass such a format argument at all (which means the string passed is constant, so no need to use printf at all - however, there are two separate tests here with different length arguments passed to re_compile_pattern, so it *does* make sense to make the strings used different so that in the event of failure it's clear which one of the tests failed). Tested with build-many-glibcs.py with GCC mainline for aarch64-linux-gnu. * posix/bug-regex22.c (main): Use puts with distinct error messages for unexpected success of re_compile_pattern, not printf with NULL argument to %s.
Diffstat (limited to 'nptl_db/td_ta_new.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions