diff options
author | Torvald Riegel <triegel@redhat.com> | 2016-12-22 10:20:43 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Torvald Riegel <triegel@redhat.com> | 2017-01-13 17:16:07 +0100 |
commit | 65810f0ef05e8c9e333f17a44e77808b163ca298 (patch) | |
tree | 09928382f6015251c3b351650204f65fc8d6ec21 /nptl/pthread_mutex_timedlock.c | |
parent | f32941d80c7f532031061f8dd4704fab9c275cfe (diff) | |
download | glibc-65810f0ef05e8c9e333f17a44e77808b163ca298.tar.gz glibc-65810f0ef05e8c9e333f17a44e77808b163ca298.tar.xz glibc-65810f0ef05e8c9e333f17a44e77808b163ca298.zip |
robust mutexes: Fix broken x86 assembly by removing it
lll_robust_unlock on i386 and x86_64 first sets the futex word to FUTEX_WAITERS|0 before calling __lll_unlock_wake, which will set the futex word to 0. If the thread is killed between these steps, then the futex word will be FUTEX_WAITERS|0, and the kernel (at least current upstream) will not set it to FUTEX_OWNER_DIED|FUTEX_WAITERS because 0 is not equal to the TID of the crashed thread. The lll_robust_lock assembly code on i386 and x86_64 is not prepared to deal with this case because the fastpath tries to only CAS 0 to TID and not FUTEX_WAITERS|0 to TID; the slowpath simply waits until it can CAS 0 to TID or the futex_word has the FUTEX_OWNER_DIED bit set. This issue is fixed by removing the custom x86 assembly code and using the generic C code instead. However, instead of adding more duplicate code to the custom x86 lowlevellock.h, the code of the lll_robust* functions is inlined into the single call sites that exist for each of these functions in the pthread_mutex_* functions. The robust mutex paths in the latter have been slightly reorganized to make them simpler. This patch is meant to be easy to backport, so C11-style atomics are not used. [BZ #20985] * nptl/Makefile: Adapt. * nptl/pthread_mutex_cond_lock.c (LLL_ROBUST_MUTEX_LOCK): Remove. (LLL_ROBUST_MUTEX_LOCK_MODIFIER): New. * nptl/pthread_mutex_lock.c (LLL_ROBUST_MUTEX_LOCK): Remove. (LLL_ROBUST_MUTEX_LOCK_MODIFIER): New. (__pthread_mutex_lock_full): Inline lll_robust* functions and adapt. * nptl/pthread_mutex_timedlock.c (pthread_mutex_timedlock): Inline lll_robust* functions and adapt. * nptl/pthread_mutex_unlock.c (__pthread_mutex_unlock_full): Likewise. * sysdeps/nptl/lowlevellock.h (__lll_robust_lock_wait, __lll_robust_lock, lll_robust_cond_lock, __lll_robust_timedlock_wait, __lll_robust_timedlock, __lll_robust_unlock): Remove. * sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/lowlevellock.h (lll_robust_lock, lll_robust_cond_lock, lll_robust_timedlock, lll_robust_unlock): Remove. * sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/lowlevellock.h (lll_robust_lock, lll_robust_cond_lock, lll_robust_timedlock, lll_robust_unlock): Remove. * sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sparc/lowlevellock.h (__lll_robust_lock_wait, __lll_robust_lock, lll_robust_cond_lock, __lll_robust_timedlock_wait, __lll_robust_timedlock, __lll_robust_unlock): Remove. * nptl/lowlevelrobustlock.c: Remove file. * nptl/lowlevelrobustlock.sym: Likewise. * sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/lowlevelrobustlock.S: Likewise. * sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/lowlevelrobustlock.S: Likewise.
Diffstat (limited to 'nptl/pthread_mutex_timedlock.c')
-rw-r--r-- | nptl/pthread_mutex_timedlock.c | 106 |
1 files changed, 85 insertions, 21 deletions
diff --git a/nptl/pthread_mutex_timedlock.c b/nptl/pthread_mutex_timedlock.c index 6915e829c1..ddd46fe414 100644 --- a/nptl/pthread_mutex_timedlock.c +++ b/nptl/pthread_mutex_timedlock.c @@ -147,9 +147,16 @@ pthread_mutex_timedlock (pthread_mutex_t *mutex, set to avoid lost wake-ups. We have the same requirement in the simple mutex algorithm. */ unsigned int assume_other_futex_waiters = 0; - do + while (1) { - again: + /* Try to acquire the lock through a CAS from 0 (not acquired) to + our TID | assume_other_futex_waiters. */ + if (__glibc_likely ((oldval == 0) + && (atomic_compare_and_exchange_bool_acq + (&mutex->__data.__lock, + id | assume_other_futex_waiters, 0) == 0))) + break; + if ((oldval & FUTEX_OWNER_DIED) != 0) { /* The previous owner died. Try locking the mutex. */ @@ -162,7 +169,7 @@ pthread_mutex_timedlock (pthread_mutex_t *mutex, if (newval != oldval) { oldval = newval; - goto again; + continue; } /* We got the mutex. */ @@ -209,30 +216,87 @@ pthread_mutex_timedlock (pthread_mutex_t *mutex, } } - result = lll_robust_timedlock (mutex->__data.__lock, abstime, - id | assume_other_futex_waiters, - PTHREAD_ROBUST_MUTEX_PSHARED (mutex)); - /* See above. We set FUTEX_WAITERS and might have shared this flag - with other threads; thus, we need to preserve it. */ - assume_other_futex_waiters = FUTEX_WAITERS; + /* We are about to block; check whether the timeout is invalid. */ + if (abstime->tv_nsec < 0 || abstime->tv_nsec >= 1000000000) + return EINVAL; + /* Work around the fact that the kernel rejects negative timeout + values despite them being valid. */ + if (__glibc_unlikely (abstime->tv_sec < 0)) + return ETIMEDOUT; +#if (!defined __ASSUME_FUTEX_CLOCK_REALTIME \ + || !defined lll_futex_timed_wait_bitset) + struct timeval tv; + struct timespec rt; + + /* Get the current time. */ + (void) __gettimeofday (&tv, NULL); + + /* Compute relative timeout. */ + rt.tv_sec = abstime->tv_sec - tv.tv_sec; + rt.tv_nsec = abstime->tv_nsec - tv.tv_usec * 1000; + if (rt.tv_nsec < 0) + { + rt.tv_nsec += 1000000000; + --rt.tv_sec; + } + + /* Already timed out? */ + if (rt.tv_sec < 0) + return ETIMEDOUT; +#endif - if (__builtin_expect (mutex->__data.__owner - == PTHREAD_MUTEX_NOTRECOVERABLE, 0)) + /* We cannot acquire the mutex nor has its owner died. Thus, try + to block using futexes. Set FUTEX_WAITERS if necessary so that + other threads are aware that there are potentially threads + blocked on the futex. Restart if oldval changed in the + meantime. */ + if ((oldval & FUTEX_WAITERS) == 0) { - /* This mutex is now not recoverable. */ - mutex->__data.__count = 0; - lll_unlock (mutex->__data.__lock, - PTHREAD_ROBUST_MUTEX_PSHARED (mutex)); - THREAD_SETMEM (THREAD_SELF, robust_head.list_op_pending, NULL); - return ENOTRECOVERABLE; + if (atomic_compare_and_exchange_bool_acq (&mutex->__data.__lock, + oldval | FUTEX_WAITERS, + oldval) + != 0) + { + oldval = mutex->__data.__lock; + continue; + } + oldval |= FUTEX_WAITERS; } - if (result == ETIMEDOUT || result == EINVAL) - goto out; + /* It is now possible that we share the FUTEX_WAITERS flag with + another thread; therefore, update assume_other_futex_waiters so + that we do not forget about this when handling other cases + above and thus do not cause lost wake-ups. */ + assume_other_futex_waiters |= FUTEX_WAITERS; + + /* Block using the futex. */ +#if (!defined __ASSUME_FUTEX_CLOCK_REALTIME \ + || !defined lll_futex_timed_wait_bitset) + lll_futex_timed wait (&mutex->__data.__lock, oldval, + &rt, PTHREAD_ROBUST_MUTEX_PSHARED (mutex)); +#else + int err = lll_futex_timed_wait_bitset (&mutex->__data.__lock, + oldval, abstime, FUTEX_CLOCK_REALTIME, + PTHREAD_ROBUST_MUTEX_PSHARED (mutex)); + /* The futex call timed out. */ + if (err == -ETIMEDOUT) + return -err; +#endif + /* Reload current lock value. */ + oldval = mutex->__data.__lock; + } - oldval = result; + /* We have acquired the mutex; check if it is still consistent. */ + if (__builtin_expect (mutex->__data.__owner + == PTHREAD_MUTEX_NOTRECOVERABLE, 0)) + { + /* This mutex is now not recoverable. */ + mutex->__data.__count = 0; + int private = PTHREAD_ROBUST_MUTEX_PSHARED (mutex); + lll_unlock (mutex->__data.__lock, private); + THREAD_SETMEM (THREAD_SELF, robust_head.list_op_pending, NULL); + return ENOTRECOVERABLE; } - while ((oldval & FUTEX_OWNER_DIED) != 0); mutex->__data.__count = 1; ENQUEUE_MUTEX (mutex); |