diff options
author | Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> | 2018-12-18 16:30:56 -0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> | 2019-04-18 17:30:06 -0300 |
commit | 9bf8e29ca136094f73f69f725f15c51facc97206 (patch) | |
tree | f79f17de093731f502dee183888a491d88263f78 /malloc/tst-malloc-too-large.c | |
parent | 52faba65f84ee5a8d82ff813bcfa0ee5f4d480cf (diff) | |
download | glibc-9bf8e29ca136094f73f69f725f15c51facc97206.tar.gz glibc-9bf8e29ca136094f73f69f725f15c51facc97206.tar.xz glibc-9bf8e29ca136094f73f69f725f15c51facc97206.zip |
malloc: make malloc fail with requests larger than PTRDIFF_MAX (BZ#23741)
As discussed previously on libc-alpha [1], this patch follows up the idea and add both the __attribute_alloc_size__ on malloc functions (malloc, calloc, realloc, reallocarray, valloc, pvalloc, and memalign) and limit maximum requested allocation size to up PTRDIFF_MAX (taking into consideration internal padding and alignment). This aligns glibc with gcc expected size defined by default warning -Walloc-size-larger-than value which warns for allocation larger than PTRDIFF_MAX. It also aligns with gcc expectation regarding libc and expected size, such as described in PR#67999 [2] and previously discussed ISO C11 issues [3] on libc-alpha. From the RFC thread [4] and previous discussion, it seems that consensus is only to limit such requested size for malloc functions, not the system allocation one (mmap, sbrk, etc.). The implementation changes checked_request2size to check for both overflow and maximum object size up to PTRDIFF_MAX. No additional checks are done on sysmalloc, so it can still issue mmap with values larger than PTRDIFF_T depending on the requested size. The __attribute_alloc_size__ is for functions that return a pointer only, which means it cannot be applied to posix_memalign (see remarks in GCC PR#87683 [5]). The runtimes checks to limit maximum requested allocation size does applies to posix_memalign. Checked on x86_64-linux-gnu and i686-linux-gnu. [1] https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2018-11/msg00223.html [2] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla//show_bug.cgi?id=67999 [3] https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2011-12/msg00066.html [4] https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2018-11/msg00224.html [5] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87683 [BZ #23741] * malloc/hooks.c (malloc_check, realloc_check): Use __builtin_add_overflow on overflow check and adapt to checked_request2size change. * malloc/malloc.c (__libc_malloc, __libc_realloc, _mid_memalign, __libc_pvalloc, __libc_calloc, _int_memalign): Limit maximum allocation size to PTRDIFF_MAX. (REQUEST_OUT_OF_RANGE): Remove macro. (checked_request2size): Change to inline function and limit maximum requested size to PTRDIFF_MAX. (__libc_malloc, __libc_realloc, _int_malloc, _int_memalign): Limit maximum allocation size to PTRDIFF_MAX. (_mid_memalign): Use _int_memalign call for overflow check. (__libc_pvalloc): Use __builtin_add_overflow on overflow check. (__libc_calloc): Use __builtin_mul_overflow for overflow check and limit maximum requested size to PTRDIFF_MAX. * malloc/malloc.h (malloc, calloc, realloc, reallocarray, memalign, valloc, pvalloc): Add __attribute_alloc_size__. * stdlib/stdlib.h (malloc, realloc, reallocarray, valloc): Likewise. * malloc/tst-malloc-too-large.c (do_test): Add check for allocation larger than PTRDIFF_MAX. * malloc/tst-memalign.c (do_test): Disable -Walloc-size-larger-than= around tests of malloc with negative sizes. * malloc/tst-posix_memalign.c (do_test): Likewise. * malloc/tst-pvalloc.c (do_test): Likewise. * malloc/tst-valloc.c (do_test): Likewise. * malloc/tst-reallocarray.c (do_test): Replace call to reallocarray with resulting size allocation larger than PTRDIFF_MAX with reallocarray_nowarn. (reallocarray_nowarn): New function. * NEWS: Mention the malloc function semantic change.
Diffstat (limited to 'malloc/tst-malloc-too-large.c')
-rw-r--r-- | malloc/tst-malloc-too-large.c | 49 |
1 files changed, 49 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/malloc/tst-malloc-too-large.c b/malloc/tst-malloc-too-large.c index 15e25f558e..c1c8cb88cc 100644 --- a/malloc/tst-malloc-too-large.c +++ b/malloc/tst-malloc-too-large.c @@ -72,13 +72,28 @@ test_large_allocations (size_t size) void * ptr_to_realloc; test_setup (); + DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT; +#if __GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) + /* GCC 7 warns about too-large allocations; here we want to test + that they fail. */ + DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (7, "-Walloc-size-larger-than="); +#endif TEST_VERIFY (malloc (size) == NULL); +#if __GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) + DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT; +#endif TEST_VERIFY (errno == ENOMEM); ptr_to_realloc = malloc (16); TEST_VERIFY_EXIT (ptr_to_realloc != NULL); test_setup (); +#if __GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) + DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (7, "-Walloc-size-larger-than="); +#endif TEST_VERIFY (realloc (ptr_to_realloc, size) == NULL); +#if __GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) + DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT; +#endif TEST_VERIFY (errno == ENOMEM); free (ptr_to_realloc); @@ -135,7 +150,13 @@ test_large_aligned_allocations (size_t size) for (align = 1; align <= pagesize; align *= 2) { test_setup (); +#if __GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) + DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (7, "-Walloc-size-larger-than="); +#endif TEST_VERIFY (memalign (align, size) == NULL); +#if __GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) + DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT; +#endif TEST_VERIFY (errno == ENOMEM); /* posix_memalign expects an alignment that is a power of 2 *and* a @@ -151,7 +172,13 @@ test_large_aligned_allocations (size_t size) if ((size % align) == 0) { test_setup (); +#if __GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) + DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (7, "-Walloc-size-larger-than="); +#endif TEST_VERIFY (aligned_alloc (align, size) == NULL); +#if __GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) + DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT; +#endif TEST_VERIFY (errno == ENOMEM); } } @@ -159,11 +186,23 @@ test_large_aligned_allocations (size_t size) /* Both valloc and pvalloc return page-aligned memory. */ test_setup (); +#if __GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) + DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (7, "-Walloc-size-larger-than="); +#endif TEST_VERIFY (valloc (size) == NULL); +#if __GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) + DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT; +#endif TEST_VERIFY (errno == ENOMEM); test_setup (); +#if __GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) + DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (7, "-Walloc-size-larger-than="); +#endif TEST_VERIFY (pvalloc (size) == NULL); +#if __GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) + DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT; +#endif TEST_VERIFY (errno == ENOMEM); } @@ -226,6 +265,16 @@ do_test (void) test_large_aligned_allocations (SIZE_MAX - i); } + /* Allocation larger than PTRDIFF_MAX does play well with C standard, + since pointer subtraction within the object might overflow ptrdiff_t + resulting in undefined behavior. To prevent it malloc function fail + for such allocations. */ + for (size_t i = 1; i <= FOURTEEN_ON_BITS; i++) + { + test_large_allocations (PTRDIFF_MAX + i); + test_large_aligned_allocations (PTRDIFF_MAX + i); + } + #if __WORDSIZE >= 64 /* On 64-bit targets, we need to test a much wider range of too-large sizes, so we test at intervals of (1 << 50) that allocation sizes |