diff options
author | Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> | 2019-12-13 10:18:24 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> | 2019-12-13 10:18:24 +0100 |
commit | 365624e2d2a342cdb693b4cc35d2312169959e28 (patch) | |
tree | 4a17435022fd7b0c03690c7ad3444b0d3c030ced /elf/tst-dlopen-nodelete-reloc.h | |
parent | 186e119bbd4a10895429ffe405ae96dc5c5634b8 (diff) | |
download | glibc-365624e2d2a342cdb693b4cc35d2312169959e28.tar.gz glibc-365624e2d2a342cdb693b4cc35d2312169959e28.tar.xz glibc-365624e2d2a342cdb693b4cc35d2312169959e28.zip |
dlopen: Fix issues related to NODELETE handling and relocations
The assumption behind the assert in activate_nodelete was wrong: Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-open.c: 459: activate_nodelete: Assertion `!imap->l_init_called || imap->l_type != lt_loaded' failed! (edit) It can happen that an already-loaded object that is in the local scope is promoted to NODELETE status, via binding to a unique symbol. Similarly, it is possible that such NODELETE promotion occurs to an already-loaded object from the global scope. This is why the loop in activate_nodelete has to cover all objects in the namespace of the new object. In do_lookup_unique, it could happen that the NODELETE status of an already-loaded object was overwritten with a pending NODELETE status. As a result, if dlopen fails, this could cause a loss of the NODELETE status of the affected object, eventually resulting in an incorrect unload. Fixes commit f63b73814f74032c0e5d0a83300e3d864ef905e5 ("Remove all loaded objects if dlopen fails, ignoring NODELETE [BZ #20839]").
Diffstat (limited to 'elf/tst-dlopen-nodelete-reloc.h')
-rw-r--r-- | elf/tst-dlopen-nodelete-reloc.h | 35 |
1 files changed, 35 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/elf/tst-dlopen-nodelete-reloc.h b/elf/tst-dlopen-nodelete-reloc.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..8844de6226 --- /dev/null +++ b/elf/tst-dlopen-nodelete-reloc.h @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ +/* Template to produce unique symbols. + Copyright (C) 2019 Free Software Foundation, Inc. + This file is part of the GNU C Library. + + The GNU C Library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or + modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public + License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either + version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. + + The GNU C Library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, + but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of + MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU + Lesser General Public License for more details. + + You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public + License along with the GNU C Library; if not, see + <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */ + +/* This template produces a unique symbol definition for an explicit + template instantiation (without also incorporating a reference), + and an extern template declaration can be used to reference that + symbol from another object. The modid parameter is just a + placeholder to create different symbols (because it affects the + name mangling of the static value member). By convention, it + should match the number of the module that contains the + definition. */ + +template <int modid> +struct unique_symbol +{ + static int value; +}; + +template <int modid> +int unique_symbol<modid>::value; |