diff options
author | Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> | 1999-02-11 14:59:52 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> | 1999-02-11 14:59:52 +0000 |
commit | 5ff1a70a0fe9c3ce3b675e7fced1b6d63ed8547b (patch) | |
tree | 74a5ec4fb8f91e200b65df7c7cf86d0ef71d2f82 /FAQ | |
parent | 49b75f5ef5da3136e4b4015e23e2fe38aacbc7b3 (diff) | |
download | glibc-5ff1a70a0fe9c3ce3b675e7fced1b6d63ed8547b.tar.gz glibc-5ff1a70a0fe9c3ce3b675e7fced1b6d63ed8547b.tar.xz glibc-5ff1a70a0fe9c3ce3b675e7fced1b6d63ed8547b.zip |
Update.
1999-02-11 Ulrich Drepper <drepper@cygnus.com> * localedata/locale/in_ID: New file. 1999-02-11 Andreas Schwab <schwab@issan.cs.uni-dortmund.de> * sysdeps/wordsize-64/inttypes.h: Always define ldiv_t if not yet defined. * sysdeps/wordsize-32/inttypes.h: Always define lldiv_t if not yet defined.
Diffstat (limited to 'FAQ')
-rw-r--r-- | FAQ | 47 |
1 files changed, 47 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/FAQ b/FAQ index 84e8796ecf..b60a1b3c97 100644 --- a/FAQ +++ b/FAQ @@ -136,6 +136,9 @@ please let me know. 3.16. Why has <netinet/ip_fw.h> disappeared? 3.17. I get floods of warnings when I use -Wconversion and include <string.h> or <math.h>. +3.18. After upgrading to glibc 2.1, I receive errors about + unresolved symbols, like `_dl_initial_searchlist' and can not + execute any binaries. What went wrong? 4. Miscellaneous @@ -1416,6 +1419,50 @@ ignore the warnings. -Wconversion isn't really intended for production use, only for shakedown compiles after converting an old program to standard C. + +3.18. After upgrading to glibc 2.1, I receive errors about + unresolved symbols, like `_dl_initial_searchlist' and can not + execute any binaries. What went wrong? + +{AJ} This normally happens if your libc and ld (dynamic linker) are from +different releases of glibc. For example, the dynamic linker +/lib/ld-linux.so.2 comes from glibc 2.0.x, but the version of libc.so.6 is +from glibc 2.1. + +The path /lib/ld-linux.so.2 is hardcoded in every glibc2 binary but +libc.so.6 is searched via /etc/ld.so.cache and in some special directories +like /lib and /usr/lib. If you run configure with another prefix than /usr +and put this prefix before /lib in /etc/ld.so.conf, your system will break. + +So what can you do? Either of the following should work: + +* Run `configure' with the same prefix argument you've used for glibc 2.0.x + so that the same paths are used. +* Replace /lib/ld-linux.so.2 with a link to the dynamic linker from glibc + 2.1. + +You can even call the dynamic linker by hand if everything fails. You've +got to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH so that the corresponding libc is found and also +need to provide an absolute path to your binary: + + LD_LIBRARY_PATH=<path-where-libc.so.6-lives> \ + <path-where-corresponding-dynamic-linker-lives>/ld-linux.so.2 \ + <path-to-binary>/binary + +For example `LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/libold /libold/ld-linux.so.2 /bin/mv ...' +might be useful in fixing a broken system (if /libold contains dynamic +linker and corresponding libc). + +With that command line no path is used. To further debug problems with the +dynamic linker, use the LD_DEBUG environment variable, e.g. +`LD_DEBUG=help echo' for the help text. + +If you just want to test this release, don't put the lib directory in +/etc/ld.so.conf. You can call programs directly with full paths (as above). +When compiling new programs against glibc 2.1, you've got to specify the +correct paths to the compiler (option -I with gcc) and linker (options +--dynamic-linker, -L and --rpath). + . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |