diff options
author | Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> | 2001-01-12 07:29:55 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> | 2001-01-12 07:29:55 +0000 |
commit | 5ef50d00ded8bb0934c2aef6c9f06acf23f66cb7 (patch) | |
tree | 20f76d7169cf0550d4224e7a2b62aba4943bc4c1 /FAQ.in | |
parent | 7e36861e77d7edde557ebf1172271e922c9a51ff (diff) | |
download | glibc-5ef50d00ded8bb0934c2aef6c9f06acf23f66cb7.tar.gz glibc-5ef50d00ded8bb0934c2aef6c9f06acf23f66cb7.tar.xz glibc-5ef50d00ded8bb0934c2aef6c9f06acf23f66cb7.zip |
Update.
2001-01-11 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> * stdlib/cxa_atexit.c (__cxa_atexit): Cast to (void *, int) func. * stdlib/cxa_finalize.c (__cxa_finalize): Add hidden second argument. * stdlib/cxa_on_exit.c: Remove. * stdlib/Makefile: Revert last patch. * stdlib/Versions: Likewise. * include/stdlib.h: Likewise. * stdlib/exit.h: Revert last patch. (struct exit_function): Add second argument to cxa fn. * stdlib/exit.c: Revert last patch. (exit): Add hidden second argument.
Diffstat (limited to 'FAQ.in')
-rw-r--r-- | FAQ.in | 9 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/FAQ.in b/FAQ.in index 51b7d53a86..7bc22de1cc 100644 --- a/FAQ.in +++ b/FAQ.in @@ -626,7 +626,7 @@ you got with your distribution. glibc 2.x? {AJ} There's only correct support for glibc 2.0.x in gcc 2.7.2.3 or later. -But you should get at least gcc 2.95.2 (or later versions) instead. +But you should get at least gcc 2.95.2.1 (or later versions) instead. ?? The `gencat' utility cannot process the catalog sources which were used on my Linux libc5 based system. Why? @@ -1020,10 +1020,9 @@ http://clisp.cons.org/~haible/gccinclude-glibc-2.2-compat.diff ?? When recompiling GCC, I get compilation errors in libio. -{BH} You are trying to recompile gcc 2.95.2? After upgrading to glibc 2.2, -you need to apply a patch to the gcc sources, because the fpos_t type and -a few libio internals have changed in glibc 2.2. T he patch is at -http://clisp.cons.org/~haible/gcc-glibc-2.2-compat.diff +{BH} You are trying to recompile gcc 2.95.2? Use gcc 2.95.2.1 instead. +This version is needed because the fpos_t type and a few libio internals +have changed in glibc 2.2, and gcc 2.95.2.1 contains a corresponding patch. ? Source and binary incompatibilities, and what to do about them |