diff options
| author | Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> | 1999-03-08 11:05:57 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> | 1999-03-08 11:05:57 +0000 |
| commit | b74656f98231fc1d31f8200b3306e2d821ec2cf4 (patch) | |
| tree | 74354d8b8bdec4319a8aa4cd7be00e1d0babbeb1 | |
| parent | 598b5dc2d78268052a8ff16e76f0427adee14dba (diff) | |
| download | glibc-b74656f98231fc1d31f8200b3306e2d821ec2cf4.tar.gz glibc-b74656f98231fc1d31f8200b3306e2d821ec2cf4.tar.xz glibc-b74656f98231fc1d31f8200b3306e2d821ec2cf4.zip | |
Fix typo.
| -rw-r--r-- | FAQ.in | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/FAQ.in b/FAQ.in index 495e30c6af..91acca2063 100644 --- a/FAQ.in +++ b/FAQ.in @@ -1278,7 +1278,7 @@ When compiling new programs against glibc 2.1, you've got to specify the correct paths to the compiler (option -I with gcc) and linker (options --dynamic-linker, -L and --rpath). -? bonnie reports that char i/o with glibc 2 is much slower than with +?? bonnie reports that char i/o with glibc 2 is much slower than with libc5. What can be done? {AJ} The GNU C library uses thread safe functions by default and libc5 used |