diff options
author | Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> | 2019-10-02 17:26:14 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> | 2019-10-02 17:26:14 +0000 |
commit | eed005270a472fe97e0a93540387bb8c81a8e36b (patch) | |
tree | 6b7e7d4f6c95ee0a01f81786e346e2c49b30a5f2 | |
parent | 4973abcba9453d54e8996a55c56ec004b669aa65 (diff) | |
download | glibc-eed005270a472fe97e0a93540387bb8c81a8e36b.tar.gz glibc-eed005270a472fe97e0a93540387bb8c81a8e36b.tar.xz glibc-eed005270a472fe97e0a93540387bb8c81a8e36b.zip |
Disable warnings in string/tester.c at top level.
string/tester.c contains code that correctly triggers various GCC warnings about dubious uses of string functions (uses that are being deliberately tested there), and duly disables those warnings around the relevant code. A change in GCC mainline resulted in this code failing to compile with a -Warray-bounds error, despite the location with the error having -Warray-bounds already disabled. This has been reported as <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91890>. This patch avoids that problem and possible future issues with these diagnostics by moving all the warning disabling in this file to top level, as suggested by Florian in <https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2019-10/msg00033.html>, rather than only doing it locally around specific function calls. Tested with build-many-glibcs.py for aarch64-linux-gnu with GCC mainline (with only the conform/ failures noted in <https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2019-10/msg00043.html>). * string/tester.c: Ignore -Warray-bounds and -Wmemset-transposed-args at top level. [__GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0)]: Ignore -Wrestrict and -Wstringop-overflow= at top level. [__GNUC_PREREQ (8, 0)]: Ignore -Wstringop-truncation at top level. (test_stpncpy): Do not ignore warnings here. (test_strncat): Likewise. (test_strncpy): Likewise. (test_memset): Likewise.
-rw-r--r-- | ChangeLog | 12 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | string/tester.c | 128 |
2 files changed, 26 insertions, 114 deletions
diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog index db769e3642..893c07cd81 100644 --- a/ChangeLog +++ b/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,15 @@ +2019-10-02 Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> + + * string/tester.c: Ignore -Warray-bounds and + -Wmemset-transposed-args at top level. + [__GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0)]: Ignore -Wrestrict and -Wstringop-overflow= + at top level. + [__GNUC_PREREQ (8, 0)]: Ignore -Wstringop-truncation at top level. + (test_stpncpy): Do not ignore warnings here. + (test_strncat): Likewise. + (test_strncpy): Likewise. + (test_memset): Likewise. + 2019-10-02 Ćukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de> * include/time.h: Add #include <bits/types/struct_timeval.h> diff --git a/string/tester.c b/string/tester.c index 24b0dad1cb..128d2c7731 100644 --- a/string/tester.c +++ b/string/tester.c @@ -34,6 +34,20 @@ #include <fcntl.h> #include <libc-diag.h> +/* This file tests a range of corner cases of string functions, + including cases where truncation occurs or where sizes specified + are larger than the actual buffers, which result in various + warnings. */ +DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (8, "-Warray-bounds"); +DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (5.0, "-Wmemset-transposed-args"); +#if __GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) +DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (9, "-Wrestrict"); +DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (7, "-Wstringop-overflow="); +#endif +#if __GNUC_PREREQ (8, 0) +DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (8, "-Wstringop-truncation"); +#endif + #define STREQ(a, b) (strcmp((a), (b)) == 0) @@ -264,15 +278,8 @@ test_stpncpy (void) { it = "stpncpy"; memset (one, 'x', sizeof (one)); - DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT; -#if __GNUC_PREREQ (8, 0) - /* GCC 8 warns about stpncpy truncating output; this is deliberately - tested here. */ - DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (8, "-Wstringop-truncation"); -#endif check (stpncpy (one, "abc", 2) == one + 2, 1); check (stpncpy (one, "abc", 3) == one + 3, 2); - DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT; check (stpncpy (one, "abc", 4) == one + 3, 3); check (one[3] == '\0' && one[4] == 'x', 4); check (stpncpy (one, "abcd", 5) == one + 4, 5); @@ -360,106 +367,41 @@ test_strncat (void) mechanism. */ it = "strncat"; (void) strcpy (one, "ijk"); - DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT; -#if __GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) - /* GCC 7 warns about the size passed to strncat being larger than - the size of the buffer; this is deliberately tested here.. */ - DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (7, "-Wstringop-overflow="); -#endif check (strncat (one, "lmn", 99) == one, 1); /* Returned value. */ - DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT; equal (one, "ijklmn", 2); /* Basic test. */ (void) strcpy (one, "x"); - DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT; -#if __GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) - /* GCC 7 warns about the size passed to strncat being larger than - the size of the buffer; this is deliberately tested here.. */ - DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (7, "-Wstringop-overflow="); -#endif (void) strncat (one, "yz", 99); - DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT; equal (one, "xyz", 3); /* Writeover. */ equal (one+4, "mn", 4); /* Wrote too much? */ (void) strcpy (one, "gh"); (void) strcpy (two, "ef"); - DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT; -#if __GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) - /* GCC 7 warns about the size passed to strncat being larger than - the size of the buffer; this is deliberately tested here; GCC 8 - gives a -Warray-bounds warning about this. */ - DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (7, "-Wstringop-overflow="); -#endif - DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (8, "-Warray-bounds"); (void) strncat (one, two, 99); - DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT; equal (one, "ghef", 5); /* Basic test encore. */ equal (two, "ef", 6); /* Stomped on source? */ (void) strcpy (one, ""); - DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT; -#if __GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) - /* GCC 7 warns about the size passed to strncat being larger than - the size of the buffer; this is deliberately tested here.. */ - DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (7, "-Wstringop-overflow="); -#endif (void) strncat (one, "", 99); - DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT; equal (one, "", 7); /* Boundary conditions. */ (void) strcpy (one, "ab"); - DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT; -#if __GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) - /* GCC 7 warns about the size passed to strncat being larger than - the size of the buffer; this is deliberately tested here.. */ - DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (7, "-Wstringop-overflow="); -#endif (void) strncat (one, "", 99); - DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT; equal (one, "ab", 8); (void) strcpy (one, ""); - DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT; -#if __GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) - /* GCC 7 warns about the size passed to strncat being larger than - the size of the buffer; this is deliberately tested here.. */ - DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (7, "-Wstringop-overflow="); -#endif (void) strncat (one, "cd", 99); - DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT; equal (one, "cd", 9); (void) strcpy (one, "ab"); - DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT; -#if __GNUC_PREREQ (8, 0) - /* GCC 8 warns about strncat truncating output; this is deliberately - tested here. */ - DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (8, "-Wstringop-truncation"); -#endif (void) strncat (one, "cdef", 2); - DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT; equal (one, "abcd", 10); /* Count-limited. */ (void) strncat (one, "gh", 0); equal (one, "abcd", 11); /* Zero count. */ - DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT; -#if __GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) - /* GCC 8 warns about strncat bound equal to source length; this is - deliberately tested here. */ - DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (8, "-Wstringop-overflow="); -#endif (void) strncat (one, "gh", 2); - DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT; equal (one, "abcdgh", 12); /* Count and length equal. */ - DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT; -#if __GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) - /* GCC 7 warns about the size passed to strncat being larger than - the size of the buffer; this is deliberately tested here.. */ - DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (7, "-Wstringop-overflow="); -#endif (void) strncat (one, "ij", (size_t)-1); /* set sign bit in count */ - DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT; equal (one, "abcdghij", 13); int ntest = 14; @@ -478,22 +420,8 @@ test_strncat (void) buf1[n2 + n3] = '\0'; strcpy (buf2 + n1, "123"); - DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT; -#if __GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) - /* GCC 7 warns about the size passed to strncat being - larger than the size of the buffer; this is - deliberately tested here; GCC 8 gives a -Warray-bounds - warning about this. */ - DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (7, "-Wstringop-overflow="); - /* GCC 9 as of 2018-06-14 warns that the size passed is - large enough that, if it were the actual object size, - the objects would have to overlap. */ - DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (9, "-Wrestrict"); -#endif - DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (8, "-Warray-bounds"); check (strncat (buf1 + n2, buf2 + n1, ~((size_t) 0) - n4) == buf1 + n2, ntest); - DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT; if (errors == olderrors) for (size_t i = 0; i < sizeof (buf1); ++i) { @@ -552,25 +480,11 @@ test_strncpy (void) equal (one, "abc", 2); /* Did the copy go right? */ (void) strcpy (one, "abcdefgh"); - DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT; -#if __GNUC_PREREQ (8, 0) - /* GCC 8 warns about strncpy truncating output; this is deliberately - tested here. */ - DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (8, "-Wstringop-truncation"); -#endif (void) strncpy (one, "xyz", 2); - DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT; equal (one, "xycdefgh", 3); /* Copy cut by count. */ (void) strcpy (one, "abcdefgh"); - DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT; -#if __GNUC_PREREQ (8, 0) - /* GCC 8 warns about strncpy truncating output; this is deliberately - tested here. */ - DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (8, "-Wstringop-truncation"); -#endif (void) strncpy (one, "xyz", 3); /* Copy cut just before NUL. */ - DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT; equal (one, "xyzdefgh", 4); (void) strcpy (one, "abcdefgh"); @@ -585,14 +499,7 @@ test_strncpy (void) equal (one+5, "fgh", 9); (void) strcpy (one, "abc"); - DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT; -#if __GNUC_PREREQ (8, 0) - /* GCC 8 warns about strncpy truncating output; this is deliberately - tested here. */ - DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (8, "-Wstringop-truncation"); -#endif (void) strncpy (one, "xyz", 0); /* Zero-length copy. */ - DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT; equal (one, "abc", 10); (void) strncpy (one, "", 2); /* Zero-length source. */ @@ -1411,15 +1318,8 @@ test_memset (void) check(memset(one+1, 'x', 3) == one+1, 1); /* Return value. */ equal(one, "axxxefgh", 2); /* Basic test. */ - DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT; -#if __GNUC_PREREQ (5, 0) - /* GCC 5.0 warns about a zero-length memset because the arguments to memset - may be in the wrong order. But we really want to test this. */ - DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (5.0, "-Wmemset-transposed-args") -#endif (void) memset(one+2, 'y', 0); equal(one, "axxxefgh", 3); /* Zero-length set. */ - DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT; (void) memset(one+5, 0, 1); equal(one, "axxxe", 4); /* Zero fill. */ |